Mercedes-AMG GT vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

Compare the Mercedes-AMG GT vs Ferrari F8 Tributo. The Mercedes-AMG GT is £70,000 cheaper. The Ferrari F8 Tributo is 0.2s quicker to 60mph. The Mercedes-AMG GT is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.

The Mercedes-AMG GT is priced from £155,000, powered by a 4.0L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 577 hp, with 800 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.1s, a top speed of 197 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The Ferrari F8 Tributo is priced from £268,000, powered by a 3.9L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 710 hp, with 770 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 211 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive.

The Mercedes-AMG GT offers a 350-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 22 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Ferrari F8 Tributo offers a 200-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 21 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.

On cost of ownership, the Mercedes-AMG GT is £70,000 cheaper than its rival, both require around £1,600 per year in maintenance, the Mercedes-AMG GT is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £85 for the Mercedes-AMG GT and £85 for the Ferrari F8 Tributo.

Driving Character: Mercedes-AMG GT vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

The Mercedes-AMG GT demonstrates the prowess of a front-mid engine layout, prioritising balance and direct feedback for the enthusiast driver. With 577hp directed to the rear wheels via a mechanical limited-slip differential, the car offers a visceral, involving experience. Steering is sharp and communicative, allowing for precise placement in corner apexes, though the rear-wheel-drive platform demands respect in damp conditions. Acceleration is blistering, with a 3.1-second 0-60mph sprint. While less forgiving than its AWD competitors, the AMG GT rewards committed driving with a dynamic repertoire that remains a benchmark for pure driver engagement within the contemporary supercar class.

The Ferrari F8 Tributo represents the zenith of the mid-engine V8 lineage, balancing 710hp with a chassis that feels telepathic. It offers immense, exploitable grip, though the sheer power delivery requires a disciplined hand. The steering is light but incredibly communicative, allowing the driver to place the nose with pinpoint precision through mid-corner transitions. Ride quality remains surprisingly compliant for such a potent platform, yet it never masks the mechanical intensity of the engine. It is a car that thrives on commitment, demanding full focus to extract the absolute limit, ultimately rewarding the driver with an experience that feels remarkably connected and raw.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari F8 Tributo takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 82 against 92. Characteristic of the Mercedes-AMG GT: Thunderous AMG V8 with a more usable, GT-focused character than before. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Sharp, communicative handling with blistering turbocharged V8 pace. In outright terms it is 577 hp against 710 — a 133 hp gap — and the Ferrari F8 Tributo reaches 60 mph 0.2s sooner.

Interior & Cabin: Mercedes-AMG GT vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

Inside, the AMG GT presents a cockpit-like environment dominated by a high transmission tunnel and a wide, driver-centric dashboard. The interior materials are of a high standard, showcasing bespoke AMG instruments and Alcantara detailing. Space is deliberately intimate, reflecting the car’s focused nature rather than grand touring comfort. Visibility is somewhat compromised by the low-slung roofline and thick pillars, yet the driving position is perfectly aligned with the pedals and steering wheel. It is an environment designed to insulate the driver from distractions, keeping the focus squarely on the task of piloting a high-performance machine through demanding roads.

Inside, the F8 Tributo strips away unnecessary clutter in favour of a driver-centric environment. It embraces a clean, functional aesthetic where materials are high-grade and tactile. The integration of modern tech, including standard Apple CarPlay, represents a significant leap forward compared to its predecessors. While the cabin is intimate, the ergonomics are spot-on, putting every vital control within easy reach of the steering wheel. It is not designed for grand touring, however, and the limited luggage space highlights its primary focus on short, sharp bursts of driving pleasure rather than extended road trips.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Mercedes-AMG GT takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 84 against 78. Characteristic of the Mercedes-AMG GT: Genuinely usable 2+2 cabin with strong build quality. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Driver-focused cabin with strong build quality.

Daily Usability: Mercedes-AMG GT vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

Usability in the AMG GT is naturally restricted by its performance-oriented design. The front trunk provides a 260-litre storage area, adequate for light travel but far from comprehensive for extended road trips. The suspension is remarkably firm even in Comfort mode, which can result in an unsettled ride on poor surfaces or urban speed bumps. Ingress and egress require a degree of physical dexterity, given the low ride height and sculpted seats. While the car can manage city errands, its primary habitat remains the open road where its performance credentials can be exercised without the constraints of suburban infrastructure.

For such an aggressive machine, the Ferrari F8 Tributo displays unexpected manners during low-speed transit. Magnetorheological dampers effectively smooth out broken asphalt, making it perfectly usable for occasional town work if one exercises caution with the width. Parking is a manageable task, though the rearward visibility reminds the owner of its mid-engine configuration. It is relatively compact by modern supercar standards, which aids in navigating tighter roads, yet the modest storage capacity effectively limits its utility to the basics. It functions as a versatile toy, rather than a multipurpose tool, for those who value performance above practical cargo requirements.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Mercedes-AMG GT takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 72 against 60. Characteristic of the Mercedes-AMG GT: More practical than the previous 2-seat GT thanks to rear seats. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Usable as an occasional daily supercar. that means 350 litres of boot space against 200, and everyday running costs that favour the Mercedes-AMG GT at the pumps.

Ownership: Mercedes-AMG GT vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

Owning an AMG GT is an investment in the traditional, high-performance V8 heritage of the brand. Residual values remain strong, bolstered by consistent demand from enthusiasts who prize the V8 character. Servicing is handled through the robust Mercedes dealer network, ensuring that specialists are always within reach, though owners must prepare for high costs associated with performance-grade brakes and tyres. Annual maintenance of £1,600 is standard for the class. Insurance costs reflect the car’s high performance and the complexity of its mechanical components, yet the model remains a prized inclusion in the garages of those who value pure engagement.

As the final pure, non-hybrid V8, the Ferrari F8 Tributo occupies a unique space in the marque’s history. Values are currently climbing, cementing its status as an essential collector’s item for enthusiasts of internal combustion. While it offers a three-year unlimited mileage warranty, prospective owners should be mindful that official servicing options at authorised dealers are becoming more constrained as production models phase out. Insurance premiums are significant, reflecting the car's extreme performance profile and the rarity of its components, making it a purchase that requires careful financial planning to maintain properly over the long term.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari F8 Tributo takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 68 against 76. Characteristic of the Mercedes-AMG GT: Backed by Mercedes-AMG's established V8 reliability record. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Strong reliability reputation among modern Ferraris. On the wallet the two diverge at £155,000 versus £268,000 — a £113,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £1,600 against £0.

More comparisons to explore