Lamborghini Revuelto vs McLaren Artura
Compare the Lamborghini Revuelto vs McLaren Artura. The McLaren Artura is £230,000 cheaper. The Lamborghini Revuelto is 0.5s quicker to 60mph. The McLaren Artura is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Lamborghini Revuelto is priced from £425,000, powered by a 6.5L V12 Hybrid, producing 1001 hp, with 850 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.5s, a top speed of 217 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive. The McLaren Artura is priced from £195,000, powered by a 3.0L V6 Hybrid, producing 671 hp, with 720 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3s, a top speed of 205 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive.
The Lamborghini Revuelto offers a 100-litre boot, runs on petrol hybrid, returns around 25 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty. The McLaren Artura offers a 188-litre boot, runs on petrol hybrid, returns around 42 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the McLaren Artura is £230,000 cheaper than its rival, the McLaren Artura costs less in annual maintenance (£4,000 versus £2,800), the McLaren Artura is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £95 for the Lamborghini Revuelto and £70 for the McLaren Artura.
Driving Character: Lamborghini Revuelto vs McLaren Artura
The Lamborghini Revuelto is a technical tour de force, pushing the boundaries of what a V12 flagship can achieve. By integrating a hybrid system, it provides a staggering 1001 hp, with three electric motors allowing for torque vectoring that completely transforms how the car rotates in a bend. While the weight penalty of the battery pack is significant, the chassis remains surprisingly poised, hiding its mass through sheer electronic wizardry. It feels incredibly futuristic, offering an acceleration profile that is violent and instant, yet it manages to retain the high-rpm scream that defines the Lamborghini V12 heritage.
The McLaren Artura marks a pivotal shift toward electrification without sacrificing the brand's legendary dynamic purity. Built upon the bespoke carbon fibre monocoque, it exhibits a level of chassis rigidity that translates into exceptionally sharp turn-in and predictable mid-corner balance. The V6 hybrid powertrain provides immediate, torque-rich acceleration, effectively eliminating the turbo-lag issues associated with older designs. While the transition between electric and internal combustion modes is generally seamless, the sheer complexity of the drivetrain can occasionally make the power delivery feel less telepathic than the pure mechanical V8s of the past, though it remains a formidable track weapon.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Revuelto takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 95 against 88. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Revuelto: Lamborghini's first series hybrid V12 - explosive, dramatic, and cutting-edge. For the McLaren Artura: McLaren's first series hybrid - sharp, rewarding, and genuinely road-focused. In outright terms it is 1001 hp against 671 — a 330 hp gap — and the Lamborghini Revuelto reaches 60 mph 0.5s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Lamborghini Revuelto vs McLaren Artura
The interior of the Lamborghini Revuelto reflects a paradigm shift for the brand, placing digital capability at the forefront while retaining a deeply mechanical, carbon-fibre-rich aesthetic. The layout is compact, mirroring the intimacy of the Aventador, but with an improved HMI that feels far more responsive and logical. Alcantara and lightweight composites provide a luxury feel that is nonetheless focused on reducing every possible gram. The interface is driver-focused, using high-resolution screens to manage the complex hybrid powertrain, ensuring that even with all the added technology, the pilot remains the central point of the experience.
Inside, the Artura discards the cluttered ergonomics of previous models in favour of a cleaner, more focused cockpit environment. The interior design successfully integrates modern technology, featuring a crisp digital instrument cluster and a responsive infotainment system that finally feels contemporary. Build quality is improved, with tactile materials and a refined aesthetic that suits its high-tech brief. However, the cabin remains undeniably snug; taller drivers may find head and shoulder room restricted, and the relative lack of integrated storage space serves as a blunt reminder that this remains a performance-first machine rather than a grand tourer.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Revuelto takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 82 against 78. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Revuelto: Modern, tech-forward cabin with genuine usability improvements. For the McLaren Artura: Modern, tech-forward cockpit with genuine daily usability.
Daily Usability: Lamborghini Revuelto vs McLaren Artura
For such a potent hypercar, the Lamborghini Revuelto offers a unique urban advantage: a silent, electric-only mode for short-range commuting. This quiet capability makes leaving home early or navigating dense city traffic far less intrusive than in previous V12 models. While the car remains wide and requires careful positioning, features like the standard nose lift system significantly improve its practicality on real-world roads. The boot space is minimal, and the hybrid system is tuned primarily for performance rather than long-range EV utility, yet it remains significantly more versatile than the V12 monsters of the past.
For a mid-engined supercar, the Artura manages urban environments with surprising grace, largely thanks to its EV-only mode, which allows for silent, emissions-free operation in city centres. Standard nose lift functionality further enhances its daily utility, enabling the car to negotiate speed bumps and steep inclines without anxiety. While the ride quality is undeniably firm in Sport settings, it remains compliant enough for moderate journeys. The primary trade-off for this hybrid functionality is the space sacrificed to house the battery pack, which reduces luggage capacity and necessitates careful packing for any extended weekend getaway.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the McLaren Artura takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 55 against 78. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Revuelto: More usable than past V12 Lamborghinis thanks to EV-only running. For the McLaren Artura: Widely reported as a genuinely daily-usable hybrid supercar. that means 100 litres of boot space against 188, and everyday running costs that favour the McLaren Artura at the pumps.
Ownership: Lamborghini Revuelto vs McLaren Artura
Owning a Lamborghini Revuelto is an exercise in exclusivity. With a new price point of £425,000 and limited production, it is a high-demand model that is likely to appreciate or hold value well. The ownership programme includes a warranty that specifically covers the hybrid components, which is crucial given the complexity of the powertrain. Annual maintenance is budgeted at £4,000, reflecting the need for manufacturer-trained specialists to handle the V12-hybrid synergy. It is a complex machine, but the support network provided ensures that this technological leap remains a viable proposition for the elite supercar collector.
Ownership of the Artura places the driver at the forefront of McLaren's electrification strategy, supported by a comprehensive warranty that covers the hybrid components—a vital safeguard for a new platform. Initial demand remains high, reinforcing its status as a significant milestone in the manufacturer's history. While annual maintenance costs are reflective of its hyper-performance engineering, the dealer network remains well-versed in the requirements of the new hybrid systems. Long-term durability is the only real question mark for prospective buyers, given the inherent complexity of the hybrid setup compared to the brand's historically mechanical V8 engines.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Revuelto takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 68 against 65. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Revuelto: Strong demand as Lamborghini's new flagship hybrid supercar. For the McLaren Artura: Improving reliability reputation as software updates mature. On the wallet the two diverge at £425,000 versus £195,000 — a £230,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £4,000 against £2,800.