Mercedes-AMG GT vs Ferrari 812 Superfast

Driving Character: Mercedes-AMG GT vs Ferrari 812 Superfast

The Mercedes-AMG GT demonstrates the prowess of a front-mid engine layout, prioritising balance and direct feedback for the enthusiast driver. With 577hp directed to the rear wheels via a mechanical limited-slip differential, the car offers a visceral, involving experience. Steering is sharp and communicative, allowing for precise placement in corner apexes, though the rear-wheel-drive platform demands respect in damp conditions. Acceleration is blistering, with a 3.1-second 0-60mph sprint. While less forgiving than its AWD competitors, the AMG GT rewards committed driving with a dynamic repertoire that remains a benchmark for pure driver engagement within the contemporary supercar class.

The Ferrari 812 Superfast delivers a visceral, raw experience defined by its 789hp naturally aspirated V12. The steering is exceptionally sharp, requiring precise inputs to manage the power delivery to the rear wheels, aided significantly by the rear-wheel steering system. It excels at high speeds but demands total focus as the limits of adhesion are tested. The chassis balance is classic front-engine GT, though the weight of the drivetrain is always apparent. It is a car that rewards a disciplined driver while punishing complacency, especially on damp British tarmac where the torque can easily overwhelm the traction control.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 812 Superfast takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 82 against 92. Characteristic of the Mercedes-AMG GT: Thunderous AMG V8 with a more usable, GT-focused character than before. For the Ferrari 812 Superfast: Ferocious naturally-aspirated V12 GT with genuine front-engined drama. In outright terms it is 577 hp against 789 — a 212 hp gap — and the Ferrari 812 Superfast reaches 60 mph 0.2s sooner.

Interior & Cabin: Mercedes-AMG GT vs Ferrari 812 Superfast

Inside, the AMG GT presents a cockpit-like environment dominated by a high transmission tunnel and a wide, driver-centric dashboard. The interior materials are of a high standard, showcasing bespoke AMG instruments and Alcantara detailing. Space is deliberately intimate, reflecting the car’s focused nature rather than grand touring comfort. Visibility is somewhat compromised by the low-slung roofline and thick pillars, yet the driving position is perfectly aligned with the pedals and steering wheel. It is an environment designed to insulate the driver from distractions, keeping the focus squarely on the task of piloting a high-performance machine through demanding roads.

Inside the 812 Superfast, the cabin prioritises driver focus while retaining an air of grand touring luxury. The architecture features a sweeping dashboard that wraps around the occupant, with high-quality materials and bespoke trim options defining the space. The optional Daytona-style seats offer excellent lateral support for spirited driving, and the driver-centric interface places all essential controls within immediate reach. However, the sheer length of the bonnet remains a persistent factor when navigating tight spaces, necessitating careful judgement of the front extremities despite the high level of interior finish and overall build quality.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Mercedes-AMG GT takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 84 against 80. Characteristic of the Mercedes-AMG GT: Genuinely usable 2+2 cabin with strong build quality. For the Ferrari 812 Superfast: Well-finished, driver-focused cabin.

Daily Usability: Mercedes-AMG GT vs Ferrari 812 Superfast

Usability in the AMG GT is naturally restricted by its performance-oriented design. The front trunk provides a 260-litre storage area, adequate for light travel but far from comprehensive for extended road trips. The suspension is remarkably firm even in Comfort mode, which can result in an unsettled ride on poor surfaces or urban speed bumps. Ingress and egress require a degree of physical dexterity, given the low ride height and sculpted seats. While the car can manage city errands, its primary habitat remains the open road where its performance credentials can be exercised without the constraints of suburban infrastructure.

For such a potent machine, the Ferrari 812 Superfast is surprisingly civilised as a long-distance companion. The 320-litre boot provides adequate space for luggage, making it the most practical front-engine offering in the modern Ferrari hierarchy. While it is perfectly comfortable over long motorway stints thanks to the compliant suspension settings, its width and length make urban manoeuvrability a chore. It demands constant vigilance in narrow city streets, yet it handles parking ramps and standard errands with enough grace to allow for genuine usability, provided the driver is prepared to manage its substantial dimensions.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Mercedes-AMG GT takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 72 against 58. Characteristic of the Mercedes-AMG GT: More practical than the previous 2-seat GT thanks to rear seats. For the Ferrari 812 Superfast: Usable GT for longer journeys, if firmly sprung. that means 350 litres of boot space against 320, and everyday running costs that favour the Mercedes-AMG GT at the pumps.

Ownership: Mercedes-AMG GT vs Ferrari 812 Superfast

Owning an AMG GT is an investment in the traditional, high-performance V8 heritage of the brand. Residual values remain strong, bolstered by consistent demand from enthusiasts who prize the V8 character. Servicing is handled through the robust Mercedes dealer network, ensuring that specialists are always within reach, though owners must prepare for high costs associated with performance-grade brakes and tyres. Annual maintenance of £1,600 is standard for the class. Insurance costs reflect the car’s high performance and the complexity of its mechanical components, yet the model remains a prized inclusion in the garages of those who value pure engagement.

As one of the final front-engined, naturally aspirated V12 masterpieces, the 812 Superfast enjoys a sterling reputation among collectors. Residual values remain robust, supported by the car's status as a pinnacle of traditional Ferrari engineering. Ownership costs, however, are substantial, with specialist maintenance required to keep the complex V12 running at peak performance. While annual service costs are significant, the peace of mind offered by professional maintenance is essential for preserving the vehicle's long-term value, as enthusiasts continue to favour these unadulterated powerplants over the industry’s shift toward smaller displacement and electrification.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 812 Superfast takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 68 against 72. Characteristic of the Mercedes-AMG GT: Backed by Mercedes-AMG's established V8 reliability record. For the Ferrari 812 Superfast: Strong Ferrari reliability reputation for a modern V12 GT. On the wallet the two diverge at £155,000 versus £275,000 — a £120,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £1,600 against £3,500.

More comparisons to explore

• McLaren Artura vs Mercedes-AMG GT
• McLaren 570S vs Mercedes-AMG GT
• Ferrari 488 GTB vs Mercedes-AMG GT
• Ferrari F8 Tributo vs Mercedes-AMG GT
• Porsche 911 GT3 RS vs Mercedes-AMG GT
• Porsche 911 GT3 vs Mercedes-AMG GT