Lamborghini Aventador vs Ferrari 12Cilindri
Compare the Lamborghini Aventador vs Ferrari 12Cilindri. The Lamborghini Aventador is £30,000 cheaper. The Lamborghini Aventador is 0.1s quicker to 60mph. The Ferrari 12Cilindri is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Lamborghini Aventador is priced from £185,000, powered by a 6.5L V12, producing 759 hp, with 720 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.8s, a top speed of 217 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive. The Ferrari 12Cilindri is priced from £395,000, powered by a 6.5L V12, producing 830 hp, with 678 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 211 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive.
The Lamborghini Aventador offers a 150-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol, returns around 14 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Ferrari 12Cilindri offers a 270-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 18 mpg, is covered by a 7yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the Lamborghini Aventador is £30,000 cheaper than its rival, both require around £4,000 per year in maintenance, the Ferrari 12Cilindri is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £95 for the Lamborghini Aventador and £100 for the Ferrari 12Cilindri.
Driving Character: Lamborghini Aventador vs Ferrari 12Cilindri
The Lamborghini Aventador preserves the dwindling art of the naturally aspirated 6.5-litre V12, an engine that sings with an intoxicating 8,500rpm crescendo. Its all-wheel-drive system, coupled with active rear-wheel steering, provides a surprising degree of traction even in challenging road conditions. However, the ISR single-clutch gearbox remains its most divisive feature, exhibiting a jerky, rhythmic pause during gear changes that feels distinctly old-school compared to modern dual-clutch transmissions. It is a car that demands a forceful hand, rewarding the driver with a mechanical engagement that feels increasingly rare in the era of digitised, turbocharged performance.
The 12Cilindri defines a new peak for front-mounted V12 performance, combining an 830hp naturally aspirated powerplant with a remarkably agile rear-wheel-drive chassis. The four-wheel steering system effectively masks the long wheelbase, granting this grand tourer a nimbleness that defies its size. While the 6.5L engine demands high-rev engagement for maximum effect, the chassis balance remains composed even when pushing near the limits of adhesion. It represents a sophisticated evolution of the 812 lineage, ensuring that the raw, mechanical intensity of the V12 remains the primary focus of the driving experience.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 12Cilindri takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 90 against 92. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Aventador: Dramatic, screaming naturally-aspirated V12 with real AWD security. For the Ferrari 12Cilindri: Naturally-aspirated V12 drama in a more refined, usable GT package. In outright terms it is 759 hp against 830 — a 71 hp gap — and the Lamborghini Aventador reaches 60 mph 0.1s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Lamborghini Aventador vs Ferrari 12Cilindri
The cabin is a striking realisation of a fighter-jet aesthetic, defined by sharp angles and an unapologetic, aggressive material palette. Visibility is notoriously poor, particularly toward the rear, forcing a heavy reliance on cameras and sensors during low-speed manoeuvres. Lamborghini provides extensive Ad Personam options, allowing for a degree of personalisation that transforms the cockpit into a unique statement of the owner’s preference. While the ergonomics are geared toward the driver, the narrow, low-slung nature of the interior reinforces the feeling of being strapped into a flight deck rather than a traditional luxury grand tourer.
Inside, the dual-cockpit dashboard draws clear inspiration from the 365 GTB/4, blending classic design motifs with a modern digital architecture. The interior feel is focused squarely on driver immersion, with the digital instrument cluster and infotainment system seamlessly integrated into the minimalist aesthetic. Materials are finished to an exceptional standard, reflecting the car's grand touring intent. While the cabin is clearly a masterclass in modern Ferrari ergonomics, the rear seats remain purely vestigial, serving as additional storage rather than a functional space for passengers.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 12Cilindri takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 68 against 85. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Aventador: Dramatic, fighter-jet-inspired cabin styling. For the Ferrari 12Cilindri: Straightforward, user-friendly cabin with genuine usability.
Daily Usability: Lamborghini Aventador vs Ferrari 12Cilindri
For all its intimidating presence, the Aventador attempts to address daily limitations through a dedicated urban mode that softens throttle response and raises the nose of the car via a hydraulic lift system. This mechanism is mandatory for navigating driveways and speed bumps, given the restrictive 90mm ground clearance. While the scissor doors deliver unparalleled theatre upon arrival, they prove cumbersome in tight car parks where vertical clearance is limited. Storage is largely symbolic, split between a shallow front trunk and a compact secondary space, making the car a challenging companion for anything beyond short-range outings.
Despite its performance pedigree, the 12Cilindri offers a practical, if physically imposing, approach to daily grand touring. The 270L boot provides genuine capacity for luggage, making it a viable companion for extended journeys. In urban environments, the four-wheel steering is indispensable, allowing the driver to navigate tight streets with a precision that belies the car's significant length and width. However, the long bonnet and expansive bodywork require a cautious approach in city centres and parking facilities, where the car’s sheer footprint can make tight manoeuvres feel somewhat daunting.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 12Cilindri takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 40 against 75. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Aventador: Usable only in short bursts - extreme dimensions and low ride height. For the Ferrari 12Cilindri: Genuinely usable as a continent-crossing daily GT. that means 150 litres of boot space against 270, plus a usable front boot in the Lamborghini Aventador, and everyday running costs that favour the Ferrari 12Cilindri at the pumps.
Ownership: Lamborghini Aventador vs Ferrari 12Cilindri
As production ceases, the Aventador has transitioned into a highly sought-after collector's asset, with values steadily climbing as enthusiasts secure the last of the naturally aspirated V12 lineage. Ownership requires a committed financial reserve; the engine's mechanical complexity and the requirement for major servicing mean that annual maintenance costs are significant. The dealer network remains the primary conduit for parts and expertise, though a small pool of independent specialists has emerged. Prospective owners must conduct rigorous pre-purchase inspections, as the longevity of the drivetrain depends entirely on the provenance of the service history provided.
Ownership of the 12Cilindri is defined by its status as a bastion of the naturally aspirated V12 in an increasingly electrified automotive landscape. The standard 7-year warranty and maintenance programme provide a high level of security for what is fundamentally a complex, high-performance machine. While fuel consumption remains notably high and insurance costs will inevitably reflect the vehicle's extreme performance potential and price point, the long-term collector appeal of such a pure-engine model remains incredibly strong, ensuring robust residual values for those who manage the ongoing running costs.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 12Cilindri takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 65 against 68. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Aventador: Now a discontinued modern classic with strong appreciation. For the Ferrari 12Cilindri: One of the last naturally-aspirated V12 Ferraris, strong collector interest. On the wallet the two diverge at £185,000 versus £395,000 — a £210,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £4,000 against £0, and warranty cover of 3yr / unlimited mi versus 7yr / unlimited mi.