Porsche 911 Turbo S vs Lamborghini Aventador
Compare the Porsche 911 Turbo S vs Lamborghini Aventador. The Porsche 911 Turbo S is £190,000 cheaper. The Porsche 911 Turbo S is 0.2s quicker to 60mph. The Porsche 911 Turbo S is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Porsche 911 Turbo S is priced from £175,000, powered by a 3.8L Twin-Turbo Flat-6, producing 640 hp, with 800 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.6s, a top speed of 205 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive. The Lamborghini Aventador is priced from £185,000, powered by a 6.5L V12, producing 759 hp, with 720 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.8s, a top speed of 217 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive.
The Porsche 911 Turbo S offers a 128-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol, returns around 20 mpg, is covered by a 4yr / 50k mi warranty. The Lamborghini Aventador offers a 150-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol, returns around 14 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the Porsche 911 Turbo S is £190,000 cheaper than its rival, the Porsche 911 Turbo S costs less in annual maintenance (£1,800 versus £4,000), the Porsche 911 Turbo S is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £90 for the Porsche 911 Turbo S and £95 for the Lamborghini Aventador.
Driving Character: Porsche 911 Turbo S vs Lamborghini Aventador
The Porsche 911 Turbo S utilises a sophisticated AWD system with active torque vectoring that provides staggering, all-weather performance. It feels deceptively rapid, with a chassis control system that masks its immense power through cornering, yet it ultimately insulates the driver more than the GT-spec siblings, prioritizing crushing point-to-point speed over nuanced steering feel.
The Lamborghini Aventador preserves the dwindling art of the naturally aspirated 6.5-litre V12, an engine that sings with an intoxicating 8,500rpm crescendo. Its all-wheel-drive system, coupled with active rear-wheel steering, provides a surprising degree of traction even in challenging road conditions. However, the ISR single-clutch gearbox remains its most divisive feature, exhibiting a jerky, rhythmic pause during gear changes that feels distinctly old-school compared to modern dual-clutch transmissions. It is a car that demands a forceful hand, rewarding the driver with a mechanical engagement that feels increasingly rare in the era of digitised, turbocharged performance.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Aventador takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 88 against 90. Characteristic of the Porsche 911 Turbo S: Immense, effortless all-wheel-drive pace with real depth of ability. For the Lamborghini Aventador: Dramatic, screaming naturally-aspirated V12 with real AWD security. In outright terms it is 640 hp against 759 — a 119 hp gap — and the Porsche 911 Turbo S reaches 60 mph 0.2s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Porsche 911 Turbo S vs Lamborghini Aventador
The cabin is remarkably refined for such a potent machine, making it a genuinely usable daily GT car. It features the signature Sport Chrono dial and luxury seating, with all technology packages seamlessly integrated. While the material quality is high, it lacks the bespoke flair or artisanal material choices found in certain Italian rivals at this price point.
The cabin is a striking realisation of a fighter-jet aesthetic, defined by sharp angles and an unapologetic, aggressive material palette. Visibility is notoriously poor, particularly toward the rear, forcing a heavy reliance on cameras and sensors during low-speed manoeuvres. Lamborghini provides extensive Ad Personam options, allowing for a degree of personalisation that transforms the cockpit into a unique statement of the owner’s preference. While the ergonomics are geared toward the driver, the narrow, low-slung nature of the interior reinforces the feeling of being strapped into a flight deck rather than a traditional luxury grand tourer.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Porsche 911 Turbo S takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 84 against 68. Characteristic of the Porsche 911 Turbo S: Supportive, comfortable seats and modern, user-friendly cabin. For the Lamborghini Aventador: Dramatic, fighter-jet-inspired cabin styling.
Daily Usability: Porsche 911 Turbo S vs Lamborghini Aventador
As the most practical 911 variant, the Turbo S offers genuine all-season confidence thanks to its AWD architecture. Its clever combination of a front boot and rear storage allows for meaningful luggage space, though the expansive body width can create significant challenges in tight urban environments. Furthermore, its sheer performance demands regular attention to tyre wear.
For all its intimidating presence, the Aventador attempts to address daily limitations through a dedicated urban mode that softens throttle response and raises the nose of the car via a hydraulic lift system. This mechanism is mandatory for navigating driveways and speed bumps, given the restrictive 90mm ground clearance. While the scissor doors deliver unparalleled theatre upon arrival, they prove cumbersome in tight car parks where vertical clearance is limited. Storage is largely symbolic, split between a shallow front trunk and a compact secondary space, making the car a challenging companion for anything beyond short-range outings.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Porsche 911 Turbo S takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 90 against 40. Characteristic of the Porsche 911 Turbo S: The most daily-usable supercar on sale — comfortable, quiet, easy to place. For the Lamborghini Aventador: Usable only in short bursts - extreme dimensions and low ride height. that means 128 litres of boot space against 150, and everyday running costs that favour the Porsche 911 Turbo S at the pumps.
Ownership: Porsche 911 Turbo S vs Lamborghini Aventador
Maintaining a stellar reputation for reliability, this model remains a benchmark for high-performance usability. It commands premium residuals in the used market, consistently holding its value well. However, prospective owners must account for high annual maintenance costs, with the complex PDK transmission and AWD system adding significant weight to long-term service intervals compared to simpler sports cars.
As production ceases, the Aventador has transitioned into a highly sought-after collector's asset, with values steadily climbing as enthusiasts secure the last of the naturally aspirated V12 lineage. Ownership requires a committed financial reserve; the engine's mechanical complexity and the requirement for major servicing mean that annual maintenance costs are significant. The dealer network remains the primary conduit for parts and expertise, though a small pool of independent specialists has emerged. Prospective owners must conduct rigorous pre-purchase inspections, as the longevity of the drivetrain depends entirely on the provenance of the service history provided.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Porsche 911 Turbo S takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 88 against 65. Characteristic of the Porsche 911 Turbo S: Exceptionally reliable for a car with supercar performance. For the Lamborghini Aventador: Now a discontinued modern classic with strong appreciation. On the wallet the two diverge at £175,000 versus £185,000 — a £10,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £1,800 against £4,000, and warranty cover of 4yr / 50k mi versus 3yr / unlimited mi.