McLaren 720S vs Lamborghini Huracán
Compare the McLaren 720S vs Lamborghini Huracán. The Lamborghini Huracán is £17,000 cheaper. The McLaren 720S is 0.1s quicker to 60mph. The McLaren 720S is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The McLaren 720S is priced from £125,000, powered by a 4.0L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 710 hp, with 770 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.8s, a top speed of 212 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The Lamborghini Huracán is priced from £208,000, powered by a 5.2L V10, producing 631 hp, with 600 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 202 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive.
The McLaren 720S offers a 150-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol, returns around 23 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Lamborghini Huracán offers a 100-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol, returns around 18 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the Lamborghini Huracán is £17,000 cheaper than its rival, the McLaren 720S costs less in annual maintenance (£3,000 versus £3,200), the McLaren 720S is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £80 for the McLaren 720S and £90 for the Lamborghini Huracán.
Driving Character: McLaren 720S vs Lamborghini Huracán
The McLaren 720S remains a benchmark for mid-engined supercar performance, pairing a 710 hp twin-turbo V8 with a sophisticated Proactive Chassis Control system. This allows it to span the gap between a supple grand tourer and a track-slaying weapon with a simple mode adjustment. The carbon fibre monocoque provides a remarkably rigid platform, allowing the suspension to work with precision. While turbo lag is present at low revs, the relentless mid-range surge is intoxicating. Steering remains communicative, though the sheer scale of the performance often outpaces the driver’s ability to fully explore the car's limit on public tarmac.
The Lamborghini Huracán excels through the visceral, linear delivery of its 5.2L naturally aspirated V10. It feels sharp and immediate, providing an emotional connection at high revolutions that turbocharged rivals often struggle to replicate. The all-wheel-drive system provides exceptional traction, allowing for confident deployment of 631 hp across varied conditions, though it does isolate the driver slightly compared to pure rear-wheel-drive platforms. It remains a masterclass in approachable performance, offering a chassis that feels inherently balanced, even if the steering lacks the final degree of granular, communicative feedback found in track-focused alternatives.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the McLaren 720S takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 93 against 90. Characteristic of the McLaren 720S: Exceptional, communicative handling widely rated among the best-driving supercars. For the Lamborghini Huracán: High-revving naturally-aspirated V10 with confidence-inspiring AWD grip. In outright terms it is 710 hp against 631 — a 79 hp gap — and the McLaren 720S reaches 60 mph 0.1s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: McLaren 720S vs Lamborghini Huracán
The cabin design prioritises visibility and function, featuring a unique folding instrument display that creates a clean, distraction-free environment for circuit work. Carbon fibre and Alcantara are the primary materials, imparting a tech-forward, high-end feel that justifies its market position. The primary weakness lies in the infotainment system, which is notoriously dated and struggles with basic connectivity compared to its rivals. However, the F1-inspired driving position and the sheer amount of glass in the dihedral doors create an airy, commanding environment that makes the 720S feel far more approachable than its rivals from Maranello or Sant'Agata.
Stepping into the Lamborghini Huracán feels like entering a fighter jet cockpit, defined by aggressive angles and a bold, dramatic aesthetic. The material quality is exemplary, featuring high-grade leathers and tactile switches that reinforce the car’s premium positioning. While the infotainment is functional and modern, some controls require a learning curve to navigate efficiently. The cabin is undeniably snug, and taller occupants may find headroom restricted by the aggressive roofline. Nevertheless, the layout remains focused entirely on the pilot, creating an immersive environment that justifies the car’s aggressive exterior posture.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Huracán takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 74 against 76. Characteristic of the McLaren 720S: Distinctive, driver-focused cockpit with excellent visibility for a supercar. For the Lamborghini Huracán: Dramatic, driver-focused cabin with strong build quality.
Daily Usability: McLaren 720S vs Lamborghini Huracán
For a vehicle capable of 212 mph, the 720S is surprisingly adept at daily errands. The adjustable suspension mode turns the car into a compliant, smooth-riding machine that handles city driving with unexpected composure. The front trunk provides a modest 150-litre space, perfect for an overnight bag, though owners must rely on the front nose lift to negotiate even minor driveways. Ingress is made easier by the dihedral doors, but the wide sills still demand a degree of flexibility. Provided one keeps a close eye on ground clearance, it is perhaps the most versatile supercar of its generation.
For a mid-engined supercar, the Lamborghini Huracán offers surprising urban manners. The all-wheel-drive system provides an all-weather advantage that makes the car feel more usable for daily errands than its rear-driven counterparts. While front visibility is respectable for this segment, the wide rear haunches and the car’s inherent low stance demand careful navigation of tight streets, causing genuine kerb anxiety in congested areas. The front storage compartment is useful for light luggage, but the 100-litre boot capacity remains a limiting factor for longer touring trips, confirming its status as a high-performance weekend specialist.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the McLaren 720S takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 55 against 55. Characteristic of the McLaren 720S: Usable as an occasional daily supercar. For the Lamborghini Huracán: Usable as an occasional daily supercar. that means 150 litres of boot space against 100, and everyday running costs that favour the McLaren 720S at the pumps.
Ownership: McLaren 720S vs Lamborghini Huracán
Maintaining a 720S is a significant commitment, with annual service costs averaging £3,000, though this is a standard entry fee for the tier of performance provided. The McLaren dealer network is well-established, and the 3-year unlimited mileage warranty provides necessary coverage for the complex drivetrain. Used prices have settled into a range that offers significant value for money compared to the original £225,000 sticker price, making it an attractive prospect for performance-focused buyers. While turbo and transmission maintenance costs are non-trivial, the car’s desirability and strong standing in the enthusiast community ensure that it remains a sound long-term investment.
The ownership experience for the Lamborghini Huracán is buoyed by a passionate, global community and a robust dealer network that understands the nuances of the 5.2L V10. While the unlimited mileage warranty provides initial peace of mind, owners must account for high annual maintenance costs of £3,200. The V10 engine requires frequent, meticulous attention, with oil change intervals that are shorter than those of mass-market luxury competitors. Residual values remain stable, supported by the Huracán's iconic status, but potential buyers should budget accordingly for the premium associated with maintaining such a sophisticated high-revving machine.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Huracán takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 70 against 78. Characteristic of the McLaren 720S: Strong performance-per-dollar reputation on the used market. For the Lamborghini Huracán: Strong reliability reputation, widely regarded as an easy-to-live-with supercar. On the wallet the two diverge at £125,000 versus £208,000 — a £83,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £3,000 against £3,200.