Lamborghini Huracán vs Ferrari 812 Superfast
Compare the Lamborghini Huracán vs Ferrari 812 Superfast. The Lamborghini Huracán is £77,000 cheaper. The Ferrari 812 Superfast is 0.0s quicker to 60mph. The Ferrari 812 Superfast is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Lamborghini Huracán is priced from £208,000, powered by a 5.2L V10, producing 631 hp, with 600 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 202 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive. The Ferrari 812 Superfast is priced from £275,000, powered by a 6.5L V12, producing 789 hp, with 718 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 211 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive.
The Lamborghini Huracán offers a 100-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol, returns around 18 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Ferrari 812 Superfast offers a 320-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 18 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the Lamborghini Huracán is £77,000 cheaper than its rival, the Lamborghini Huracán costs less in annual maintenance (£3,200 versus £3,500), a full tank costs around £90 for the Lamborghini Huracán and £100 for the Ferrari 812 Superfast.
Driving Character: Lamborghini Huracán vs Ferrari 812 Superfast
The Lamborghini Huracán excels through the visceral, linear delivery of its 5.2L naturally aspirated V10. It feels sharp and immediate, providing an emotional connection at high revolutions that turbocharged rivals often struggle to replicate. The all-wheel-drive system provides exceptional traction, allowing for confident deployment of 631 hp across varied conditions, though it does isolate the driver slightly compared to pure rear-wheel-drive platforms. It remains a masterclass in approachable performance, offering a chassis that feels inherently balanced, even if the steering lacks the final degree of granular, communicative feedback found in track-focused alternatives.
The Ferrari 812 Superfast delivers a visceral, raw experience defined by its 789hp naturally aspirated V12. The steering is exceptionally sharp, requiring precise inputs to manage the power delivery to the rear wheels, aided significantly by the rear-wheel steering system. It excels at high speeds but demands total focus as the limits of adhesion are tested. The chassis balance is classic front-engine GT, though the weight of the drivetrain is always apparent. It is a car that rewards a disciplined driver while punishing complacency, especially on damp British tarmac where the torque can easily overwhelm the traction control.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 812 Superfast takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 90 against 92. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Huracán: High-revving naturally-aspirated V10 with confidence-inspiring AWD grip. For the Ferrari 812 Superfast: Ferocious naturally-aspirated V12 GT with genuine front-engined drama. In outright terms it is 631 hp against 789 — a 158 hp gap — and the Ferrari 812 Superfast reaches 60 mph 0.0s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Lamborghini Huracán vs Ferrari 812 Superfast
Stepping into the Lamborghini Huracán feels like entering a fighter jet cockpit, defined by aggressive angles and a bold, dramatic aesthetic. The material quality is exemplary, featuring high-grade leathers and tactile switches that reinforce the car’s premium positioning. While the infotainment is functional and modern, some controls require a learning curve to navigate efficiently. The cabin is undeniably snug, and taller occupants may find headroom restricted by the aggressive roofline. Nevertheless, the layout remains focused entirely on the pilot, creating an immersive environment that justifies the car’s aggressive exterior posture.
Inside the 812 Superfast, the cabin prioritises driver focus while retaining an air of grand touring luxury. The architecture features a sweeping dashboard that wraps around the occupant, with high-quality materials and bespoke trim options defining the space. The optional Daytona-style seats offer excellent lateral support for spirited driving, and the driver-centric interface places all essential controls within immediate reach. However, the sheer length of the bonnet remains a persistent factor when navigating tight spaces, necessitating careful judgement of the front extremities despite the high level of interior finish and overall build quality.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 812 Superfast takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 76 against 80. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Huracán: Dramatic, driver-focused cabin with strong build quality. For the Ferrari 812 Superfast: Well-finished, driver-focused cabin.
Daily Usability: Lamborghini Huracán vs Ferrari 812 Superfast
For a mid-engined supercar, the Lamborghini Huracán offers surprising urban manners. The all-wheel-drive system provides an all-weather advantage that makes the car feel more usable for daily errands than its rear-driven counterparts. While front visibility is respectable for this segment, the wide rear haunches and the car’s inherent low stance demand careful navigation of tight streets, causing genuine kerb anxiety in congested areas. The front storage compartment is useful for light luggage, but the 100-litre boot capacity remains a limiting factor for longer touring trips, confirming its status as a high-performance weekend specialist.
For such a potent machine, the Ferrari 812 Superfast is surprisingly civilised as a long-distance companion. The 320-litre boot provides adequate space for luggage, making it the most practical front-engine offering in the modern Ferrari hierarchy. While it is perfectly comfortable over long motorway stints thanks to the compliant suspension settings, its width and length make urban manoeuvrability a chore. It demands constant vigilance in narrow city streets, yet it handles parking ramps and standard errands with enough grace to allow for genuine usability, provided the driver is prepared to manage its substantial dimensions.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 812 Superfast takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 55 against 58. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Huracán: Usable as an occasional daily supercar. For the Ferrari 812 Superfast: Usable GT for longer journeys, if firmly sprung. that means 100 litres of boot space against 320, plus a usable front boot in the Lamborghini Huracán.
Ownership: Lamborghini Huracán vs Ferrari 812 Superfast
The ownership experience for the Lamborghini Huracán is buoyed by a passionate, global community and a robust dealer network that understands the nuances of the 5.2L V10. While the unlimited mileage warranty provides initial peace of mind, owners must account for high annual maintenance costs of £3,200. The V10 engine requires frequent, meticulous attention, with oil change intervals that are shorter than those of mass-market luxury competitors. Residual values remain stable, supported by the Huracán's iconic status, but potential buyers should budget accordingly for the premium associated with maintaining such a sophisticated high-revving machine.
As one of the final front-engined, naturally aspirated V12 masterpieces, the 812 Superfast enjoys a sterling reputation among collectors. Residual values remain robust, supported by the car's status as a pinnacle of traditional Ferrari engineering. Ownership costs, however, are substantial, with specialist maintenance required to keep the complex V12 running at peak performance. While annual service costs are significant, the peace of mind offered by professional maintenance is essential for preserving the vehicle's long-term value, as enthusiasts continue to favour these unadulterated powerplants over the industry’s shift toward smaller displacement and electrification.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Huracán takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 78 against 72. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Huracán: Strong reliability reputation, widely regarded as an easy-to-live-with supercar. For the Ferrari 812 Superfast: Strong Ferrari reliability reputation for a modern V12 GT. On the wallet the two diverge at £208,000 versus £275,000 — a £67,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £3,200 against £3,500.