Ferrari Roma vs Mercedes-AMG GT
Compare the Ferrari Roma vs Mercedes-AMG GT. The Mercedes-AMG GT is £40,000 cheaper. The Mercedes-AMG GT is 0.3s quicker to 60mph. The Ferrari Roma is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Ferrari Roma is priced from £195,000, powered by a 3.9L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 612 hp, with 760 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.4s, a top speed of 199 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The Mercedes-AMG GT is priced from £155,000, powered by a 4.0L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 577 hp, with 800 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.1s, a top speed of 197 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive.
The Ferrari Roma offers a 272-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 24 mpg, is covered by a 7yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Mercedes-AMG GT offers a 350-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 22 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the Mercedes-AMG GT is £40,000 cheaper than its rival, both require around £0 per year in maintenance, the Ferrari Roma is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £85 for the Ferrari Roma and £85 for the Mercedes-AMG GT.
Driving Character: Ferrari Roma vs Mercedes-AMG GT
The Ferrari Roma is designed for the modern gentleman, offering a 3.9L Twin-Turbo V8 that favours refined, broad-shouldered power over the erratic spikes of a track weapon. Its chassis is balanced and fluid, encouraging long, spirited drives across country roads rather than focused track sessions. The steering is direct, yet it avoids the twitchiness found in more aggressive models, providing a relaxing pace that feels perfectly weighted. While it can certainly deliver when provoked, the Roma’s true nature is discovered in its ability to maintain high speeds with a sense of poise and composure that is rarely found in grand tourers.
The Mercedes-AMG GT demonstrates the prowess of a front-mid engine layout, prioritising balance and direct feedback for the enthusiast driver. With 577hp directed to the rear wheels via a mechanical limited-slip differential, the car offers a visceral, involving experience. Steering is sharp and communicative, allowing for precise placement in corner apexes, though the rear-wheel-drive platform demands respect in damp conditions. Acceleration is blistering, with a 3.1-second 0-60mph sprint. While less forgiving than its AWD competitors, the AMG GT rewards committed driving with a dynamic repertoire that remains a benchmark for pure driver engagement within the contemporary supercar class.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Mercedes-AMG GT takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 78 against 82. Characteristic of the Ferrari Roma: Elegant, GT-focused dynamics rather than outright sports car sharpness. For the Mercedes-AMG GT: Thunderous AMG V8 with a more usable, GT-focused character than before. In outright terms it is 612 hp against 577 — a 35 hp gap — and the Mercedes-AMG GT reaches 60 mph 0.3s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Ferrari Roma vs Mercedes-AMG GT
The cabin of the Roma is arguably the most elegant interior Ferrari has produced in recent memory. It creates a cocoon-like atmosphere with a 2+ layout that is refined, focusing on high-quality tactile materials rather than just performance metrics. Tech is present, though the infotainment is less cutting-edge than the ultra-modern SF90, which feels appropriate for a car intended for long-distance comfort. The rear seats are suitable for short journeys or extra storage, providing a level of practicality that is often missing from its siblings. It feels like a space designed for the journey, not just for the destination.
Inside, the AMG GT presents a cockpit-like environment dominated by a high transmission tunnel and a wide, driver-centric dashboard. The interior materials are of a high standard, showcasing bespoke AMG instruments and Alcantara detailing. Space is deliberately intimate, reflecting the car’s focused nature rather than grand touring comfort. Visibility is somewhat compromised by the low-slung roofline and thick pillars, yet the driving position is perfectly aligned with the pedals and steering wheel. It is an environment designed to insulate the driver from distractions, keeping the focus squarely on the task of piloting a high-performance machine through demanding roads.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari Roma takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 85 against 84. Characteristic of the Ferrari Roma: Beautifully designed, minimalist 2+2 cabin. For the Mercedes-AMG GT: Genuinely usable 2+2 cabin with strong build quality.
Daily Usability: Ferrari Roma vs Mercedes-AMG GT
For those seeking an everyday Ferrari, the Roma is the standout choice. The 272-litre boot is impressively sized for a front-engine coupe, easily handling luggage for a weekend away. Its longer wheelbase and softer suspension settings make it remarkably comfortable for long hauls, smoothing out road imperfections that would typically unsettle a mid-engine model. In town, it is manageable, although its width still requires care in tight parking structures. Overall, it succeeds as a practical daily driver, balancing enough performance to thrill with the civility required for everyday chores and commutes, making it the most usable model currently available.
Usability in the AMG GT is naturally restricted by its performance-oriented design. The front trunk provides a 260-litre storage area, adequate for light travel but far from comprehensive for extended road trips. The suspension is remarkably firm even in Comfort mode, which can result in an unsettled ride on poor surfaces or urban speed bumps. Ingress and egress require a degree of physical dexterity, given the low ride height and sculpted seats. While the car can manage city errands, its primary habitat remains the open road where its performance credentials can be exercised without the constraints of suburban infrastructure.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari Roma takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 75 against 72. Characteristic of the Ferrari Roma: Ferrari's most usable, comfortable everyday GT. For the Mercedes-AMG GT: More practical than the previous 2-seat GT thanks to rear seats. that means 272 litres of boot space against 350, and everyday running costs that favour the Ferrari Roma at the pumps.
Ownership: Ferrari Roma vs Mercedes-AMG GT
The Roma is well-supported by Ferrari’s seven-year warranty, providing exceptional peace of mind for those looking to use the car frequently. It is positioned to attract a broader demographic of buyers, including those who may not want a dedicated mid-engine sports car. While residual values are slightly softer than the more extreme models in the lineup due to its status as a grand tourer, the lower cost of maintenance makes it an attractive proposition for long-term ownership. It is an honest, well-engineered vehicle that serves as a solid foundation for those looking to enter the Ferrari ownership experience.
Owning an AMG GT is an investment in the traditional, high-performance V8 heritage of the brand. Residual values remain strong, bolstered by consistent demand from enthusiasts who prize the V8 character. Servicing is handled through the robust Mercedes dealer network, ensuring that specialists are always within reach, though owners must prepare for high costs associated with performance-grade brakes and tyres. Annual maintenance of £1,600 is standard for the class. Insurance costs reflect the car’s high performance and the complexity of its mechanical components, yet the model remains a prized inclusion in the garages of those who value pure engagement.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari Roma takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 74 against 68. Characteristic of the Ferrari Roma: Strong reliability reputation among modern Ferraris. For the Mercedes-AMG GT: Backed by Mercedes-AMG's established V8 reliability record. On the wallet the two diverge at £195,000 versus £155,000 — a £40,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £0 against £1,600, and warranty cover of 7yr / unlimited mi versus 3yr / unlimited mi.