Aston Martin Vantage vs Audi RS e-tron GT
Compare the Aston Martin Vantage vs Audi RS e-tron GT. The Aston Martin Vantage is £4,100 cheaper. The Audi RS e-tron GT is 0.4s quicker to 60mph. The Audi RS e-tron GT is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Aston Martin Vantage is priced from £120,900, powered by a 4.0L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 503 hp, with 685 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.5s, a top speed of 195 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The Audi RS e-tron GT is priced from £125,000, powered by a Dual Electric Motors, producing 637 hp, with 830 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.1s, a top speed of 155 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive.
The Aston Martin Vantage offers a 350-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 25mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Audi RS e-tron GT offers a 405-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on electric, returns around 76 mpg, is covered by a 4yr / 50k mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the Aston Martin Vantage is £4,100 cheaper than its rival, the Aston Martin Vantage costs less in annual maintenance (£900 versus £1,000), the Audi RS e-tron GT is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £110 for the Aston Martin Vantage and £15 for the Audi RS e-tron GT.
Driving Character: Aston Martin Vantage vs Audi RS e-tron GT
The Vantage utilizes a 4.0L twin-turbo V8 to deliver a punchy 503 hp that defines its boisterous character. Its short wheelbase and wide track create a nimble, almost twitchy handling profile that demands constant input from the driver. The steering is direct, and the rear-wheel-drive architecture allows for significant adjustability through corners, though the traction control often intervenes aggressively in wet conditions to manage the 685 Nm of torque. It is a sports car that rewards experienced hands, trading absolute refinement for an engaging, visceral experience that feels decidedly more muscular than many of its rivals.
The RS e-tron GT leverages 637 hp and instant electric torque to deliver breathtaking acceleration, pinning occupants to their seats with brutal efficiency. The low centre of gravity provided by the battery pack ensures the car remains impressively flat through corners, though the sheer weight of 5139 lbs is occasionally felt in tighter, technical transitions. It lacks the raw, emotive soundtrack of a combustion-engined rival, but compensates with a refined, futuristic chassis that makes covering ground effortless. The two-speed rear gearbox provides a unique mechanical feel, bridging the gap between electric immediacy and high-speed stability.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Aston Martin Vantage takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 84 against 78. Characteristic of the Aston Martin Vantage: Sharp, engaging chassis with a thunderous AMG-sourced V8. For the Audi RS e-tron GT: Immense, silent electric acceleration with quattro-assured composure. In outright terms it is 503 hp against 637 — a 134 hp gap — and the Audi RS e-tron GT reaches 60 mph 0.4s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Aston Martin Vantage vs Audi RS e-tron GT
The interior is a focused, driver-centric environment, though the reliance on older-generation Mercedes-Benz switchgear is increasingly apparent against modern standards. The cabin is trimmed in high-quality Alcantara and leather, conveying a sense of purpose rather than pure opulence. The rotary infotainment controller is functional but lacks the slickness of current touchscreen interfaces. While the driving position is low and perfectly suited for spirited work, some materials in the lower dashboard areas lack the premium feel one might expect given the brand’s positioning. Practicality is limited, yet the space feels appropriate for a focused sports machine.
The interior is a high-tech sanctuary, dominated by a driver-focused dashboard and the crisp Audi Virtual Cockpit. Sustainable materials are used throughout, reflecting a modern approach to luxury without compromising on build quality or feel. The digital interfaces are intuitive, though the reliance on touch-sensitive controls for certain functions can be less tactile than physical buttons while on the move. Space is ample for four adults, and the dual-screen setup creates a sophisticated, connected environment that feels perfectly suited for a high-performance electric tourer. It is a cabin that successfully blends traditional Audi craftsmanship with progressive, forward-thinking technology.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Audi RS e-tron GT takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 80 against 86. Characteristic of the Aston Martin Vantage: Significantly improved cabin quality and tech over the outgoing car. For the Audi RS e-tron GT: Premium, minimalist cabin with excellent tech integration.
Daily Usability: Aston Martin Vantage vs Audi RS e-tron GT
Daily usability is a mixed bag, with the Vantage excelling on open roads while requiring caution in urban settings. The front trunk provides a modest 325L of storage, which is surprisingly practical for short trips, provided one watches the low front splitter on kerbs and speed bumps. The ride is notably firm, especially in Sport mode, which can be fatiguing over longer distances on poor road surfaces. However, for a high-performance sports car, its compact dimensions make it relatively easy to place in traffic, provided the driver is mindful of the wide bodywork during parking.
Practicality is a strong suit for the RS e-tron GT, offering a 405L boot plus additional storage in the front trunk, making it an excellent daily prospect. The ride is firm in Dynamic mode but remains composed enough for long-distance cruising, absorbing motorway imperfections with ease. Charging is a simple affair, with fast-charging capabilities allowing for 80% replenishment in just over twenty minutes, significantly increasing the vehicle's real-world usability. It is a highly capable machine for routine errands and long-distance touring, provided the driver is aware of the low stance and the necessity of managing battery capacity on longer jaunts.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Audi RS e-tron GT takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 62 against 80. Characteristic of the Aston Martin Vantage: More usable day-to-day than previous Vantage generations. For the Audi RS e-tron GT: Comfortable, quiet, effortless daily EV with real usability. that means 350 litres of boot space against 405, plus a usable front boot in the Audi RS e-tron GT, and everyday running costs that favour the Audi RS e-tron GT at the pumps.
Ownership: Aston Martin Vantage vs Audi RS e-tron GT
The ownership proposition of the Vantage has improved significantly, with an expanding dealer network that makes servicing more accessible than in previous years. Maintenance costs are relatively modest at £900 annually, though turbo-related upkeep can add up as the car ages. The Vantage badge retains considerable brand cachet, which keeps residual values strong in the competitive sports car market. It remains a popular choice for those who want a blend of heritage, performance, and day-to-day usability without the extreme costs associated with the ultra-luxury, low-volume models in the Aston Martin stable.
Ownership of this EV is relatively straightforward, as the simplicity of the electric drivetrain results in lower annual maintenance costs than its internal combustion rivals. The four-year, 50k mile warranty provides a solid foundation for peace of mind, though long-term battery health remains a key consideration for high-mileage users. The RS e-tron GT benefits from the extensive Audi dealer and charging network, making it one of the most accessible high-performance EVs on the market. While residual values for luxury EVs remain volatile, the model’s performance and build quality help maintain a solid market position among modern, tech-focused buyers.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Audi RS e-tron GT takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 58 against 82. Characteristic of the Aston Martin Vantage: Entry-level Aston with a strong enthusiast following. For the Audi RS e-tron GT: Low running costs typical of an EV, strong warranty coverage. On the wallet the two diverge at £120,900 versus £125,000 — a £4,100 difference, with annual maintenance of £900 against £1,000, and warranty cover of 3yr / unlimited mi versus 4yr / 50k mi.