Porsche 911 GT3 Touring vs Ferrari Roma
Compare the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring vs Ferrari Roma. The Porsche 911 GT3 Touring is £52,000 cheaper. The Porsche 911 GT3 Touring is 0.2s quicker to 60mph. The Ferrari Roma is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Porsche 911 GT3 Touring is priced from £165,000, powered by a 4.0L Flat-6, producing 502 hp, with 347 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.2s, a top speed of 197 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The Ferrari Roma is priced from £195,000, powered by a 3.9L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 612 hp, with 760 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.4s, a top speed of 199 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive.
The Porsche 911 GT3 Touring offers a 132-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol, returns around 23 mpg, is covered by a 4yr / 50k mi warranty. The Ferrari Roma offers a 272-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 24 mpg, is covered by a 7yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring is £52,000 cheaper than its rival, both require around £1,500 per year in maintenance, the Ferrari Roma is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £85 for the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring and £85 for the Ferrari Roma.
Driving Character: Porsche 911 GT3 Touring vs Ferrari Roma
The Porsche 911 GT3 Touring is a masterclass in analogue engagement, defined by its naturally aspirated 4.0L flat-six engine. The delivery is linear and ferocious, encouraging the driver to explore the upper reaches of the rev range. By pairing this engine with a manual gearbox, Porsche offers a pure, tactile experience that focuses on the harmony between driver and machine. While the removal of the rear wing sacrifices some high-speed downforce, the resulting aesthetic is understated. The chassis remains exceptionally communicative, providing the kind of steering feedback that standard sports cars simply fail to replicate.
The Ferrari Roma is designed for the modern gentleman, offering a 3.9L Twin-Turbo V8 that favours refined, broad-shouldered power over the erratic spikes of a track weapon. Its chassis is balanced and fluid, encouraging long, spirited drives across country roads rather than focused track sessions. The steering is direct, yet it avoids the twitchiness found in more aggressive models, providing a relaxing pace that feels perfectly weighted. While it can certainly deliver when provoked, the Roma’s true nature is discovered in its ability to maintain high speeds with a sense of poise and composure that is rarely found in grand tourers.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 95 against 78. Characteristic of the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring: GT3 engagement without the fixed wing - understated, visceral, motorsport-derived. For the Ferrari Roma: Elegant, GT-focused dynamics rather than outright sports car sharpness. In outright terms it is 502 hp against 612 — a 110 hp gap — and the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring reaches 60 mph 0.2s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Porsche 911 GT3 Touring vs Ferrari Roma
Inside the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring, the environment is defined by refined functionality. The cabin strips away the race-car excess of the standard GT3, opting for a luxurious full leather finish that elevates the daily driving experience. The instrumentation is clear and driver-focused, with the tech suite providing modern convenience without cluttering the interface. While the rear seats are vestigial and serve primarily as a parcel shelf, the front seating provides excellent support for long-distance driving. It is a space designed for focus, where the quality of the materials mirrors the precision of the mechanics.
The cabin of the Roma is arguably the most elegant interior Ferrari has produced in recent memory. It creates a cocoon-like atmosphere with a 2+ layout that is refined, focusing on high-quality tactile materials rather than just performance metrics. Tech is present, though the infotainment is less cutting-edge than the ultra-modern SF90, which feels appropriate for a car intended for long-distance comfort. The rear seats are suitable for short journeys or extra storage, providing a level of practicality that is often missing from its siblings. It feels like a space designed for the journey, not just for the destination.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari Roma takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 65 against 85. Characteristic of the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring: More understated, higher-quality cabin trim than the standard GT3. For the Ferrari Roma: Beautifully designed, minimalist 2+2 cabin.
Daily Usability: Porsche 911 GT3 Touring vs Ferrari Roma
Despite its hardcore engineering, the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring possesses surprising urban manners. The manual gearbox is forgiving in traffic, and the front boot, supplemented by rear storage, offers enough capacity for weekend luggage. While the suspension remains stiff, it is well-damped, handling public roads with composure rather than harshness. The Touring specification is significantly more discreet than its winged counterpart, allowing it to blend into everyday traffic without attracting unwanted attention. It is a rare example of a high-performance vehicle that remains perfectly viable for the occasional shopping run or city commute.
For those seeking an everyday Ferrari, the Roma is the standout choice. The 272-litre boot is impressively sized for a front-engine coupe, easily handling luggage for a weekend away. Its longer wheelbase and softer suspension settings make it remarkably comfortable for long hauls, smoothing out road imperfections that would typically unsettle a mid-engine model. In town, it is manageable, although its width still requires care in tight parking structures. Overall, it succeeds as a practical daily driver, balancing enough performance to thrill with the civility required for everyday chores and commutes, making it the most usable model currently available.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari Roma takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 60 against 75. Characteristic of the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring: Usable daily if you accept its intensity, slightly more discreet than the winged GT3. For the Ferrari Roma: Ferrari's most usable, comfortable everyday GT. that means 132 litres of boot space against 272, plus a usable front boot in the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring, and everyday running costs that favour the Ferrari Roma at the pumps.
Ownership: Porsche 911 GT3 Touring vs Ferrari Roma
The Porsche 911 GT3 Touring is a cornerstone of the modern enthusiast market, with its manual transmission driving high demand. Residual values are exceptionally robust, reflecting the car's status as a future classic. Porsche’s comprehensive dealer network ensures that servicing is predictable, though the GT3-spec components, particularly the optional PCCB brakes, carry higher maintenance premiums. With a four-year warranty providing peace of mind, the ownership experience is remarkably stress-free for a car of this calibre. It is a sophisticated investment that rewards its custodian with consistent, high-fidelity thrills over many years.
The Roma is well-supported by Ferrari’s seven-year warranty, providing exceptional peace of mind for those looking to use the car frequently. It is positioned to attract a broader demographic of buyers, including those who may not want a dedicated mid-engine sports car. While residual values are slightly softer than the more extreme models in the lineup due to its status as a grand tourer, the lower cost of maintenance makes it an attractive proposition for long-term ownership. It is an honest, well-engineered vehicle that serves as a solid foundation for those looking to enter the Ferrari ownership experience.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 80 against 74. Characteristic of the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring: Strong Porsche reliability and huge collector demand. For the Ferrari Roma: Strong reliability reputation among modern Ferraris. On the wallet the two diverge at £165,000 versus £195,000 — a £30,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £1,500 against £0, and warranty cover of 4yr / 50k mi versus 7yr / unlimited mi.