Porsche 718 Spyder RS vs Porsche 911 GT3 Touring
Compare the Porsche 718 Spyder RS vs Porsche 911 GT3 Touring. The Porsche 718 Spyder RS is £13,000 cheaper. The Porsche 911 GT3 Touring is 0.2s quicker to 60mph. The Porsche 911 GT3 Touring is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Porsche 718 Spyder RS is priced from £140,000, powered by a 4.0L Flat-6, producing 493 hp, with 450 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.4s, a top speed of 196 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The Porsche 911 GT3 Touring is priced from £165,000, powered by a 4.0L Flat-6, producing 502 hp, with 347 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.2s, a top speed of 197 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive.
The Porsche 718 Spyder RS offers a 125-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol, returns around 23 mpg, is covered by a 4yr / 50k mi warranty. The Porsche 911 GT3 Touring offers a 132-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol, returns around 23 mpg, is covered by a 4yr / 50k mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the Porsche 718 Spyder RS is £13,000 cheaper than its rival, the Porsche 718 Spyder RS costs less in annual maintenance (£1,400 versus £1,500), a full tank costs around £70 for the Porsche 718 Spyder RS and £85 for the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring.
Driving Character: Porsche 718 Spyder RS vs Porsche 911 GT3 Touring
The Porsche 718 Spyder RS is defined by its mid-engine configuration and the installation of the 4.0L flat-six from the GT3. The chassis is a masterpiece of precision, featuring RS-specific suspension geometry that rewards technical accuracy. The steering feel is sharp and communicative, offering a visceral connection to the tarmac that few modern roadsters can replicate. While it is certainly capable on a track, the engine note and open-top architecture make it a raw experience on winding B-roads. The gearshifts are lightning fast, ensuring the powertrain remains at the heart of the driving sensation throughout every spirited corner.
The Porsche 911 GT3 Touring is a masterclass in analogue engagement, defined by its naturally aspirated 4.0L flat-six engine. The delivery is linear and ferocious, encouraging the driver to explore the upper reaches of the rev range. By pairing this engine with a manual gearbox, Porsche offers a pure, tactile experience that focuses on the harmony between driver and machine. While the removal of the rear wing sacrifices some high-speed downforce, the resulting aesthetic is understated. The chassis remains exceptionally communicative, providing the kind of steering feedback that standard sports cars simply fail to replicate.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 94 against 95. Characteristic of the Porsche 718 Spyder RS: GT4 RS power in an open-top body - visceral and track-honed. For the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring: GT3 engagement without the fixed wing - understated, visceral, motorsport-derived. In outright terms it is 493 hp against 502 — a 9 hp gap — and the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring reaches 60 mph 0.2s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Porsche 718 Spyder RS vs Porsche 911 GT3 Touring
Inside, the Porsche 718 Spyder RS prioritises weight saving over luxury. The carbon fibre bucket seats provide immense support, while the use of fabric door pulls and minimal sound insulation highlights its motorsport heritage. Build quality is characteristically high, though the cabin environment is undeniably sparse compared to a standard 718. The infotainment system is functional rather than flashy, providing necessary data without distracting from the task of driving. Despite the lack of plush padding, the driver-focused ergonomics remain impeccable, creating a purposeful space that reflects the uncompromising nature of the vehicle’s design philosophy.
Inside the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring, the environment is defined by refined functionality. The cabin strips away the race-car excess of the standard GT3, opting for a luxurious full leather finish that elevates the daily driving experience. The instrumentation is clear and driver-focused, with the tech suite providing modern convenience without cluttering the interface. While the rear seats are vestigial and serve primarily as a parcel shelf, the front seating provides excellent support for long-distance driving. It is a space designed for focus, where the quality of the materials mirrors the precision of the mechanics.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 52 against 65. Characteristic of the Porsche 718 Spyder RS: Stripped-back, motorsport-focused cockpit. For the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring: More understated, higher-quality cabin trim than the standard GT3.
Daily Usability: Porsche 718 Spyder RS vs Porsche 911 GT3 Touring
Daily utility is clearly secondary to performance in the Porsche 718 Spyder RS, yet it remains surprisingly manageable. The inclusion of a nose lift system as standard allows for navigation over urban speed bumps and steep inclines without damaging the front splitter. Storage is adequate for a weekend getaway, with both a front boot and a rear luggage compartment available for essential items. Ingress and egress require some physical agility due to the low-slung bucket seats and side sills, but for owners who accept the compromise of a manual roof operation, it serves as a usable roadster.
Despite its hardcore engineering, the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring possesses surprising urban manners. The manual gearbox is forgiving in traffic, and the front boot, supplemented by rear storage, offers enough capacity for weekend luggage. While the suspension remains stiff, it is well-damped, handling public roads with composure rather than harshness. The Touring specification is significantly more discreet than its winged counterpart, allowing it to blend into everyday traffic without attracting unwanted attention. It is a rare example of a high-performance vehicle that remains perfectly viable for the occasional shopping run or city commute.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 38 against 60. Characteristic of the Porsche 718 Spyder RS: Usable but clearly built for spirited driving over commuting. For the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring: Usable daily if you accept its intensity, slightly more discreet than the winged GT3. that means 125 litres of boot space against 132.
Ownership: Porsche 718 Spyder RS vs Porsche 911 GT3 Touring
Ownership of the Porsche 718 Spyder RS is defined by its exclusivity and potential for appreciation. As a model with limited production, it sits in a secure position within the enthusiast market. While annual maintenance costs are high, the support provided by the Porsche Motorsport division offers peace of mind for specialized mechanical needs. Insurance premiums will be substantial, and the high purchase price requires careful consideration, but the prospect of long-term residual strength remains strong. For collectors and enthusiasts alike, it represents a peak of internal combustion performance within the Porsche stable.
The Porsche 911 GT3 Touring is a cornerstone of the modern enthusiast market, with its manual transmission driving high demand. Residual values are exceptionally robust, reflecting the car's status as a future classic. Porsche’s comprehensive dealer network ensures that servicing is predictable, though the GT3-spec components, particularly the optional PCCB brakes, carry higher maintenance premiums. With a four-year warranty providing peace of mind, the ownership experience is remarkably stress-free for a car of this calibre. It is a sophisticated investment that rewards its custodian with consistent, high-fidelity thrills over many years.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 78 against 80. Characteristic of the Porsche 718 Spyder RS: Mechanically simple, Porsche-grade reliability. For the Porsche 911 GT3 Touring: Strong Porsche reliability and huge collector demand. On the wallet the two diverge at £140,000 versus £165,000 — a £25,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £1,400 against £1,500.