Porsche 718 Spyder RS vs Porsche 911 S/T

Compare the Porsche 718 Spyder RS vs Porsche 911 S/T. The Porsche 718 Spyder RS is £98,000 cheaper. The Porsche 718 Spyder RS is 0.3s quicker to 60mph. The Porsche 718 Spyder RS is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.

The Porsche 718 Spyder RS is priced from £140,000, powered by a 4.0L Flat-6, producing 493 hp, with 450 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.4s, a top speed of 196 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The Porsche 911 S/T is priced from £410,000, powered by a 4.0L Flat-6, producing 525 hp, with 470 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.7s, a top speed of 186 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive.

The Porsche 718 Spyder RS offers a 125-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol, returns around 23 mpg, is covered by a 4yr / 50k mi warranty. The Porsche 911 S/T offers a 100-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 22 mpg, is covered by a 4yr / 50k mi warranty.

On cost of ownership, the Porsche 718 Spyder RS is £98,000 cheaper than its rival, the Porsche 718 Spyder RS costs less in annual maintenance (£1,400 versus £1,800), the Porsche 718 Spyder RS is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £70 for the Porsche 718 Spyder RS and £85 for the Porsche 911 S/T.

Driving Character: Porsche 718 Spyder RS vs Porsche 911 S/T

The Porsche 718 Spyder RS is defined by its mid-engine configuration and the installation of the 4.0L flat-six from the GT3. The chassis is a masterpiece of precision, featuring RS-specific suspension geometry that rewards technical accuracy. The steering feel is sharp and communicative, offering a visceral connection to the tarmac that few modern roadsters can replicate. While it is certainly capable on a track, the engine note and open-top architecture make it a raw experience on winding B-roads. The gearshifts are lightning fast, ensuring the powertrain remains at the heart of the driving sensation throughout every spirited corner.

The Porsche 911 S/T is a masterstroke of lightweight engineering, stripping away the excesses of modern GT cars to create a pure, analogue experience. With 525 hp from its 4.0L flat-six, it is light, agile, and incredibly communicative. The steering is sharp, providing exceptional feedback that connects the driver directly to the tarmac. While it lacks the aggressive aero package of the GT3 RS, the S/T is far more rewarding on winding roads, where its balance and precision truly shine. It is a visceral, high-revving celebration of everything that makes a 911 special, free from the complexity of electronic interference.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Porsche 911 S/T takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 94 against 97. Characteristic of the Porsche 718 Spyder RS: GT4 RS power in an open-top body - visceral and track-honed. For the Porsche 911 S/T: The lightest, most analogue modern 911 - manual gearbox, GT3 RS engine, no rear-wheel steering. In outright terms it is 493 hp against 525 — a 32 hp gap — and the Porsche 718 Spyder RS reaches 60 mph 0.3s sooner.

Interior & Cabin: Porsche 718 Spyder RS vs Porsche 911 S/T

Inside, the Porsche 718 Spyder RS prioritises weight saving over luxury. The carbon fibre bucket seats provide immense support, while the use of fabric door pulls and minimal sound insulation highlights its motorsport heritage. Build quality is characteristically high, though the cabin environment is undeniably sparse compared to a standard 718. The infotainment system is functional rather than flashy, providing necessary data without distracting from the task of driving. Despite the lack of plush padding, the driver-focused ergonomics remain impeccable, creating a purposeful space that reflects the uncompromising nature of the vehicle’s design philosophy.

Inside, the Porsche 911 S/T features a minimalist cockpit that highlights its lightweight mission. The absence of rear seats and the use of carbon-fibre bucket seats with houndstooth cloth create a purposeful, retro-modern atmosphere. Every detail, from the lightweight door pulls to the unique instrument cluster, feels carefully considered to reduce weight without compromising build quality. While it lacks the ultimate comfort features of a base Carrera, the S/T offers a driving environment that is focused solely on the task of performance. It is a stripped-back, high-quality cabin that perfectly mirrors the vehicle's dynamic aspirations.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Porsche 911 S/T takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 52 against 60. Characteristic of the Porsche 718 Spyder RS: Stripped-back, motorsport-focused cockpit. For the Porsche 911 S/T: Lightweight, motorsport-flavoured cabin with genuine everyday habitability.

Daily Usability: Porsche 718 Spyder RS vs Porsche 911 S/T

Daily utility is clearly secondary to performance in the Porsche 718 Spyder RS, yet it remains surprisingly manageable. The inclusion of a nose lift system as standard allows for navigation over urban speed bumps and steep inclines without damaging the front splitter. Storage is adequate for a weekend getaway, with both a front boot and a rear luggage compartment available for essential items. Ingress and egress require some physical agility due to the low-slung bucket seats and side sills, but for owners who accept the compromise of a manual roof operation, it serves as a usable roadster.

For such a focused sports car, the Porsche 911 S/T is surprisingly usable, thanks in large part to its slightly softer suspension tuning compared to the RS. The narrow body makes it much easier to park and navigate through narrow urban streets than wider, winged models. However, users must remain cautious with ground clearance on steep ramps and driveways. The boot is sufficient for light luggage, provided you aren't planning an extensive road trip. It serves best as a car for the weekend blast or the alpine pass, where its agility and light weight truly excel in practice.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Porsche 911 S/T takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 38 against 55. Characteristic of the Porsche 718 Spyder RS: Usable but clearly built for spirited driving over commuting. For the Porsche 911 S/T: More usable daily than a GT3 RS thanks to the single-mass flywheel manual. that means 125 litres of boot space against 100, plus a usable front boot in the Porsche 718 Spyder RS, and everyday running costs that favour the Porsche 718 Spyder RS at the pumps.

Ownership: Porsche 718 Spyder RS vs Porsche 911 S/T

Ownership of the Porsche 718 Spyder RS is defined by its exclusivity and potential for appreciation. As a model with limited production, it sits in a secure position within the enthusiast market. While annual maintenance costs are high, the support provided by the Porsche Motorsport division offers peace of mind for specialized mechanical needs. Insurance premiums will be substantial, and the high purchase price requires careful consideration, but the prospect of long-term residual strength remains strong. For collectors and enthusiasts alike, it represents a peak of internal combustion performance within the Porsche stable.

Owning the Porsche 911 S/T is a pinnacle of Porsche ownership, defined by extreme rarity and intense collector interest. The model's historical significance and limited build numbers ensure that residual values remain exceptionally high, far exceeding the original purchase price. While maintenance is handled through the standard Porsche dealer network, the exclusive nature of the S/T means that bespoke parts can be expensive. With a four-year warranty, the ownership experience is as reliable as it is exciting. It is a car that rewards the dedicated enthusiast with both mechanical delight and long-term investment stability.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Porsche 911 S/T takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 78 against 82. Characteristic of the Porsche 718 Spyder RS: Mechanically simple, Porsche-grade reliability. For the Porsche 911 S/T: Instant collector status as a manual-only, ultra-limited 911. On the wallet the two diverge at £140,000 versus £410,000 — a £270,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £1,400 against £1,800.

More comparisons to explore