McLaren 765LT vs Lamborghini Revuelto
Compare the McLaren 765LT vs Lamborghini Revuelto. The McLaren 765LT is £115,000 cheaper. The Lamborghini Revuelto is 0.2s quicker to 60mph. The Lamborghini Revuelto is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The McLaren 765LT is priced from £350,000, powered by a 4.0L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 755 hp, with 800 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.7s, a top speed of 205 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The Lamborghini Revuelto is priced from £425,000, powered by a 6.5L V12 Hybrid, producing 1001 hp, with 850 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.5s, a top speed of 217 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive.
The McLaren 765LT offers a 150-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol, returns around 21 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Lamborghini Revuelto offers a 100-litre boot, runs on petrol hybrid, returns around 25 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the McLaren 765LT is £115,000 cheaper than its rival, the McLaren 765LT costs less in annual maintenance (£3,200 versus £4,000), the Lamborghini Revuelto is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £80 for the McLaren 765LT and £95 for the Lamborghini Revuelto.
Driving Character: McLaren 765LT vs Lamborghini Revuelto
The McLaren 765LT is a visceral exercise in weight reduction and aerodynamic precision, stripping back the Sports Series to its purest form. With a 755 hp twin-turbo V8 and a kerb weight of just 2709 lbs, it delivers a 0-60 sprint of 2.7 seconds. The chassis is significantly stiffer than the 720S, providing a track-oriented platform that communicates every pebble through the steering rack. Its unique top-exit exhaust system adds a raw, aggressive soundtrack, though the aggressive gearshifts and stiff springs ensure the car is perpetually on edge, demanding absolute focus from the driver on every public road.
The Lamborghini Revuelto is a technical tour de force, pushing the boundaries of what a V12 flagship can achieve. By integrating a hybrid system, it provides a staggering 1001 hp, with three electric motors allowing for torque vectoring that completely transforms how the car rotates in a bend. While the weight penalty of the battery pack is significant, the chassis remains surprisingly poised, hiding its mass through sheer electronic wizardry. It feels incredibly futuristic, offering an acceleration profile that is violent and instant, yet it manages to retain the high-rpm scream that defines the Lamborghini V12 heritage.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the McLaren 765LT takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 96 against 95. Characteristic of the McLaren 765LT: The most extreme, track-derived McLaren Longtail - razor-sharp and uncompromising. For the Lamborghini Revuelto: Lamborghini's first series hybrid V12 - explosive, dramatic, and cutting-edge. In outright terms it is 755 hp against 1001 — a 246 hp gap — and the Lamborghini Revuelto reaches 60 mph 0.2s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: McLaren 765LT vs Lamborghini Revuelto
The interior of the 765LT is decidedly Spartan, prioritising the removal of excess mass over creature comforts. Lightweight carbon fibre bucket seats and stripped-back door panels define the cabin, with Alcantara surfaces replacing traditional materials to save every possible gram. While the interface is functional, it feels archaic in the face of current market standards, yet few drivers will care when surrounded by such focused, motorsport-grade architecture. The lack of heavy sound-deadening material ensures the cabin is a loud, busy environment, but it effectively underscores the car's intent as a track-day weapon repurposed for the road.
The interior of the Lamborghini Revuelto reflects a paradigm shift for the brand, placing digital capability at the forefront while retaining a deeply mechanical, carbon-fibre-rich aesthetic. The layout is compact, mirroring the intimacy of the Aventador, but with an improved HMI that feels far more responsive and logical. Alcantara and lightweight composites provide a luxury feel that is nonetheless focused on reducing every possible gram. The interface is driver-focused, using high-resolution screens to manage the complex hybrid powertrain, ensuring that even with all the added technology, the pilot remains the central point of the experience.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Revuelto takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 50 against 82. Characteristic of the McLaren 765LT: Stripped-back, motorsport-focused cockpit. For the Lamborghini Revuelto: Modern, tech-forward cabin with genuine usability improvements.
Daily Usability: McLaren 765LT vs Lamborghini Revuelto
Usability takes a backseat in the 765LT, yet it remains surprisingly capable for the occasional cross-country blast. The front lift system is a mandatory inclusion for navigating urban infrastructure, given the car's ultra-low front splitter and aggressive side skirts. Luggage space is limited to a 150-litre capacity that is mostly consumed by the necessities of track days rather than grand touring. Ingress and egress require a certain level of physical agility, as the carbon monocoque sills are exceptionally wide. It is not designed for daily commuting, but as a weekend escape machine, it serves its specific purpose admirably.
For such a potent hypercar, the Lamborghini Revuelto offers a unique urban advantage: a silent, electric-only mode for short-range commuting. This quiet capability makes leaving home early or navigating dense city traffic far less intrusive than in previous V12 models. While the car remains wide and requires careful positioning, features like the standard nose lift system significantly improve its practicality on real-world roads. The boot space is minimal, and the hybrid system is tuned primarily for performance rather than long-range EV utility, yet it remains significantly more versatile than the V12 monsters of the past.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Revuelto takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 30 against 55. Characteristic of the McLaren 765LT: Built for track days, not commuting. For the Lamborghini Revuelto: More usable than past V12 Lamborghinis thanks to EV-only running. that means 150 litres of boot space against 100, plus a usable front boot in the McLaren 765LT, and everyday running costs that favour the Lamborghini Revuelto at the pumps.
Ownership: McLaren 765LT vs Lamborghini Revuelto
Ownership of the 765LT is a premium proposition, with annual maintenance reaching £3,200 due to the bespoke nature of its Longtail components. While the 3-year unlimited mileage warranty provides a safety net, the high-performance demands on the powertrain require diligent servicing. Collector interest in the Longtail badge has kept residual values exceptionally high, often exceeding the initial purchase price of £310,000 in the used market. It is a specialist vehicle for the dedicated enthusiast, where the cost of entry and maintenance is secondary to the unique, raw performance experience that only a limited-run McLaren can provide.
Owning a Lamborghini Revuelto is an exercise in exclusivity. With a new price point of £425,000 and limited production, it is a high-demand model that is likely to appreciate or hold value well. The ownership programme includes a warranty that specifically covers the hybrid components, which is crucial given the complexity of the powertrain. Annual maintenance is budgeted at £4,000, reflecting the need for manufacturer-trained specialists to handle the V12-hybrid synergy. It is a complex machine, but the support network provided ensures that this technological leap remains a viable proposition for the elite supercar collector.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the McLaren 765LT takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 78 against 68. Characteristic of the McLaren 765LT: Instant collector status as a limited-run 'Longtail' McLaren. For the Lamborghini Revuelto: Strong demand as Lamborghini's new flagship hybrid supercar. On the wallet the two diverge at £350,000 versus £425,000 — a £75,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £3,200 against £4,000.