Lamborghini Huracán vs Aston Martin DBX707
Compare the Lamborghini Huracán vs Aston Martin DBX707. The Lamborghini Huracán is £2,000 cheaper. The Lamborghini Huracán is 0.4s quicker to 60mph. The Aston Martin DBX707 is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Lamborghini Huracán is priced from £208,000, powered by a 5.2L V10, producing 631 hp, with 600 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 202 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive. The Aston Martin DBX707 is priced from £210,000, powered by a 4.0L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 707 hp, with 900 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.3s, a top speed of 193 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive.
The Lamborghini Huracán offers a 100-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol, returns around 18 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Aston Martin DBX707 offers a 632-litre boot, folding rear seats, runs on petrol, returns around 21 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the Lamborghini Huracán is £2,000 cheaper than its rival, the Aston Martin DBX707 costs less in annual maintenance (£3,200 versus £1,700), the Aston Martin DBX707 is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £90 for the Lamborghini Huracán and £100 for the Aston Martin DBX707.
Driving Character: Lamborghini Huracán vs Aston Martin DBX707
The Lamborghini Huracán excels through the visceral, linear delivery of its 5.2L naturally aspirated V10. It feels sharp and immediate, providing an emotional connection at high revolutions that turbocharged rivals often struggle to replicate. The all-wheel-drive system provides exceptional traction, allowing for confident deployment of 631 hp across varied conditions, though it does isolate the driver slightly compared to pure rear-wheel-drive platforms. It remains a masterclass in approachable performance, offering a chassis that feels inherently balanced, even if the steering lacks the final degree of granular, communicative feedback found in track-focused alternatives.
The DBX707 redefines the expectations of a luxury SUV, injecting 707hp of twin-turbo V8 fury into a high-riding chassis that refuses to behave like a typical utility vehicle. With its intelligent all-wheel-drive system and electronic rear differential, it manages to put its immense power down with surprising effectiveness. While it possesses remarkable grip, the physics of its 5071 lbs weight inevitably surface during aggressive cornering. The nine-speed wet-clutch gearbox is snappy, providing gear changes that feel purposeful and sharp, allowing the driver to exploit the engine's 900Nm of torque to its absolute limit with confidence and speed.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Huracán takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 90 against 78. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Huracán: High-revving naturally-aspirated V10 with confidence-inspiring AWD grip. For the Aston Martin DBX707: Startlingly quick and composed for a two-tonne-plus SUV. In outright terms it is 631 hp against 707 — a 76 hp gap — and the Lamborghini Huracán reaches 60 mph 0.4s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Lamborghini Huracán vs Aston Martin DBX707
Stepping into the Lamborghini Huracán feels like entering a fighter jet cockpit, defined by aggressive angles and a bold, dramatic aesthetic. The material quality is exemplary, featuring high-grade leathers and tactile switches that reinforce the car’s premium positioning. While the infotainment is functional and modern, some controls require a learning curve to navigate efficiently. The cabin is undeniably snug, and taller occupants may find headroom restricted by the aggressive roofline. Nevertheless, the layout remains focused entirely on the pilot, creating an immersive environment that justifies the car’s aggressive exterior posture.
The interior of the DBX707 is a masterclass in performance luxury, featuring bespoke sport seats and Alcantara detailing that separates it from the standard model. It offers genuine, spacious accommodation for four adults, ensuring that performance does not come at the expense of passenger comfort. However, when compared to the ultra-modern interfaces of the Cayenne or the Urus, the cabin tech feels slightly behind the curve. While the build quality is superb and the materials are quintessentially British, the infotainment system lacks the cutting-edge fluidity of its most direct rivals at this price point.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Aston Martin DBX707 takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 76 against 85. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Huracán: Dramatic, driver-focused cabin with strong build quality. For the Aston Martin DBX707: Lavish, driver-focused cabin unlike most performance SUV rivals.
Daily Usability: Lamborghini Huracán vs Aston Martin DBX707
For a mid-engined supercar, the Lamborghini Huracán offers surprising urban manners. The all-wheel-drive system provides an all-weather advantage that makes the car feel more usable for daily errands than its rear-driven counterparts. While front visibility is respectable for this segment, the wide rear haunches and the car’s inherent low stance demand careful navigation of tight streets, causing genuine kerb anxiety in congested areas. The front storage compartment is useful for light luggage, but the 100-litre boot capacity remains a limiting factor for longer touring trips, confirming its status as a high-performance weekend specialist.
Practicality is the DBX707’s greatest asset, boasting a 632-litre boot that makes it a legitimate family vehicle capable of swallowing luggage with ease. Its air suspension system with adaptive dampers allows the car to switch seamlessly between a composed, comfortable cruiser and a stiffened, responsive performance machine. While fuel economy is inevitably poor at 21mpg, the trade-off is a level of versatility rarely seen in such a powerful vehicle. It is a car that thrives on variety, handling the school run and high-speed motorways with equal parts ease and effortless, explosive capability.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Aston Martin DBX707 takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 55 against 82. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Huracán: Usable as an occasional daily supercar. For the Aston Martin DBX707: Genuinely practical family SUV with supercar-baiting pace. that means 100 litres of boot space against 632, plus a usable front boot in the Lamborghini Huracán, and everyday running costs that favour the Aston Martin DBX707 at the pumps.
Ownership: Lamborghini Huracán vs Aston Martin DBX707
The ownership experience for the Lamborghini Huracán is buoyed by a passionate, global community and a robust dealer network that understands the nuances of the 5.2L V10. While the unlimited mileage warranty provides initial peace of mind, owners must account for high annual maintenance costs of £3,200. The V10 engine requires frequent, meticulous attention, with oil change intervals that are shorter than those of mass-market luxury competitors. Residual values remain stable, supported by the Huracán's iconic status, but potential buyers should budget accordingly for the premium associated with maintaining such a sophisticated high-revving machine.
Maintaining a DBX707 is a manageable affair compared to its more exclusive siblings, thanks to the expansion of the Aston Martin dealer network and improved service accessibility. Demand for the vehicle on the used market is robust, driven by the growing appetite for high-performance SUVs, though early depreciation remains a factor for first owners. Tyre costs are significant given the car’s weight and performance, and owners must prepare for the regular attention required by such a high-output platform. Overall, it serves as a reliable, albeit premium-cost, flagship for those needing utility with a supercar-killing powertrain.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Huracán takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 78 against 62. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Huracán: Strong reliability reputation, widely regarded as an easy-to-live-with supercar. For the Aston Martin DBX707: Strong demand keeps residuals healthy. On the wallet the two diverge at £208,000 versus £210,000 — a £2,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £3,200 against £1,700.