Ferrari Daytona SP3 vs Koenigsegg Jesko
Compare the Ferrari Daytona SP3 vs Koenigsegg Jesko. The Ferrari Daytona SP3 is £650,000 cheaper. The Koenigsegg Jesko is 0.4s quicker to 60mph. The Ferrari Daytona SP3 is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Ferrari Daytona SP3 is priced from £6,000,000, powered by a 6.5L V12, producing 829 hp, with 697 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.85s, a top speed of 211 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The Koenigsegg Jesko is priced from £2,500,000, powered by a 5.0L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 1600 hp, with 1500 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.5s, a top speed of 330 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive.
The Ferrari Daytona SP3 offers a 80-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 16 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Koenigsegg Jesko offers a 120-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 14 mpg, is covered by a 2yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the Ferrari Daytona SP3 is £650,000 cheaper than its rival, both require around £0 per year in maintenance, the Ferrari Daytona SP3 is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £100 for the Ferrari Daytona SP3 and £110 for the Koenigsegg Jesko.
Driving Character: Ferrari Daytona SP3 vs Koenigsegg Jesko
The Ferrari Daytona SP3 is a masterclass in naturally aspirated engineering, deriving its 829hp from a V12 that screams to 9,250rpm. Built upon a rigid carbon fibre monocoque, the chassis offers exceptional stiffness, providing a direct, communicative connection between the road and the driver. Despite its extreme performance potential, the SP3 maintains a GT-inspired character, focusing on the quality of the driving experience rather than pure track-lap obsession. It is a machine that feels inherently special, with a weight distribution and balance that reflect its mid-engine layout, yet it remains refined enough for spirited B-road driving.
The Koenigsegg Jesko is a monstrous exhibition of engineering, built around a 1,600hp twin-turbo V8. Its 9-speed Light Speed Transmission is a work of genius, providing rapid, uninterrupted gear shifts that keep the engine in the meat of its power band. The car's RWD layout paired with sophisticated aero creates a driving experience that is incredibly sharp and feedback-heavy. Even with its insane output, the steering is precise and communicative, though the sheer power requires immense respect and a high level of driver skill to manage, especially on public roads where its performance potential far exceeds any legal limit.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Koenigsegg Jesko takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 94 against 97. Characteristic of the Ferrari Daytona SP3: Naturally-aspirated V12 theatre in a barchetta-style, track-honed hypercar. For the Koenigsegg Jesko: Astonishing, race-derived performance with a bespoke 9-speed multi-clutch gearbox. In outright terms it is 829 hp against 1600 — a 771 hp gap — and the Koenigsegg Jesko reaches 60 mph 0.4s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Ferrari Daytona SP3 vs Koenigsegg Jesko
The cabin of the Ferrari Daytona SP3 is a stylistic triumph, heavily influenced by the 1960s prototypes that bear the same name. Alcantara and carbon fibre dominate the cockpit, creating an environment that feels both retro and avant-garde. The seating position is low, and the lack of traditional infotainment screens keeps the driver focused on the mechanical interface. The removable targa roof provides an immersive sensory experience, though this focus on design does necessitate a severe compromise in interior storage. It is arguably the most dramatic interior Ferrari has produced, prioritising theatre over practical storage solutions.
Inside, the Jesko is a masterclass in minimalist design, where carbon fibre and Alcantara dominate the cabin. Every element feels deliberate and purposeful, devoid of unnecessary fluff. The unique climate control wheel and the central touchscreen interface are unconventional, reflecting the brand’s distinct approach to vehicle interaction. While the cabin is beautifully finished, it is extremely compact, offering almost no room for additional storage beyond the basics. It feels like an extension of the car’s mechanical core rather than a luxury suite, prioritising the relationship between driver and machine over any form of conventional passenger comfort.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Koenigsegg Jesko takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 55 against 60. Characteristic of the Ferrari Daytona SP3: Minimalist, motorsport-inspired cockpit true to its Icona-series heritage. For the Koenigsegg Jesko: Surprisingly well-finished cockpit for a hand-built hypercar.
Daily Usability: Ferrari Daytona SP3 vs Koenigsegg Jesko
Daily utility is clearly not the primary goal of the Ferrari Daytona SP3, yet it manages the realities of modern driving with surprising composure. The inclusion of a nose lift system is vital, allowing this low-slung, wide-bodied machine to traverse driveways and speed bumps that would otherwise be impassable. Luggage capacity is minimal at just 80 litres, meaning it is ill-suited for more than light touring. In city traffic, its extreme width commands attention, turning simple errands into an exercise in precision driving, yet for the few who own one, this lack of practicality is considered an essential part of the charm.
Driving the Jesko in the real world is a formidable task. While the standard nose lift system helps with driveways and speed bumps, the car’s extreme width and stiff suspension make it impractical for routine city errands. It is not designed for comfort; it is a hypercar built for the track or wide, open stretches of tarmac. The storage capacity is limited to a small front trunk, which is enough for a soft bag but little else. It is a car that demands a specific environment to be enjoyed fully, remaining a challenging partner for anything resembling daily or suburban use.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari Daytona SP3 takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 25 against 20. Characteristic of the Ferrari Daytona SP3: A pure collector's piece not intended for daily use. For the Koenigsegg Jesko: Not built for daily use - a pure track/collector hypercar. that means 80 litres of boot space against 120, and everyday running costs that favour the Ferrari Daytona SP3 at the pumps.
Ownership: Ferrari Daytona SP3 vs Koenigsegg Jesko
With only 599 units ever produced, the Ferrari Daytona SP3 occupies an elite tier of the collector market. The Icona badge serves as a guarantee of long-term appreciation, placing it among the most sought-after cars in existence. While the initial purchase price is eye-watering, the specialised support from the Ferrari Special Products team ensures that ownership is as frictionless as possible. Maintenance remains a specialist affair, and while the limited production run makes parts and service access exclusive, the SP3 stands as an investment-grade vehicle that transcends traditional automotive cost-benefit analysis.
Ownership of a Jesko is an elite endeavour supported by Koenigsegg’s global Flying Doctor service. With every allocation sold out before production even reached full tilt, it is one of the most exclusive machines in existence. However, maintaining such a bespoke masterpiece is not a trivial matter; annual maintenance must be performed by highly trained specialists, and the associated costs are truly extraordinary. Values are expected to rise further as the car becomes a piece of automotive history, yet the reality of ownership is one of constant, high-level technical oversight to keep the machine operating at its peak.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari Daytona SP3 takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 85 against 75. Characteristic of the Ferrari Daytona SP3: Instant blue-chip collector status as a limited Icona-series Ferrari. For the Koenigsegg Jesko: Ultra-exclusive Swedish hypercar with strong collector demand. On the wallet the two diverge at £6,000,000 versus £2,500,000 — a £3,500,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £0 against £12,000, and warranty cover of 3yr / unlimited mi versus 2yr / unlimited mi.