Ferrari Daytona SP3 vs Mercedes-AMG ONE

Compare the Ferrari Daytona SP3 vs Mercedes-AMG ONE. The Ferrari Daytona SP3 is £550,000 cheaper. The Ferrari Daytona SP3 is 0.0s quicker to 60mph. The Mercedes-AMG ONE is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.

The Ferrari Daytona SP3 is priced from £6,000,000, powered by a 6.5L V12, producing 829 hp, with 697 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.85s, a top speed of 211 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The Mercedes-AMG ONE is priced from £3,500,000, powered by a 1.6L V6 Hybrid, producing 1049 hp, with 900 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 219 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive.

The Ferrari Daytona SP3 offers a 80-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 16 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Mercedes-AMG ONE offers a 130-litre boot, runs on petrol hybrid, returns around 45 mpg, is covered by a 2yr / unlimited mi warranty.

On cost of ownership, the Ferrari Daytona SP3 is £550,000 cheaper than its rival, both require around £0 per year in maintenance, the Mercedes-AMG ONE is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £100 for the Ferrari Daytona SP3 and £60 for the Mercedes-AMG ONE.

Driving Character: Ferrari Daytona SP3 vs Mercedes-AMG ONE

The Ferrari Daytona SP3 is a masterclass in naturally aspirated engineering, deriving its 829hp from a V12 that screams to 9,250rpm. Built upon a rigid carbon fibre monocoque, the chassis offers exceptional stiffness, providing a direct, communicative connection between the road and the driver. Despite its extreme performance potential, the SP3 maintains a GT-inspired character, focusing on the quality of the driving experience rather than pure track-lap obsession. It is a machine that feels inherently special, with a weight distribution and balance that reflect its mid-engine layout, yet it remains refined enough for spirited B-road driving.

The Mercedes-AMG ONE is a staggering achievement, packing a 1049 hp hybrid V6 directly descended from Formula One. It pulls with relentless intensity, climbing to a dizzying 11,000rpm redline that makes every other road car feel pedestrian. With all-wheel drive and active aero, it provides grip levels that defy physics, yet the chassis is complex and demanding, requiring a bespoke, F1-inspired suspension setup to manage its immense power. It is not built for comfort; this is a track-focused machine where every component serves the pursuit of raw, unadulterated speed.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Mercedes-AMG ONE takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 94 against 97. Characteristic of the Ferrari Daytona SP3: Naturally-aspirated V12 theatre in a barchetta-style, track-honed hypercar. For the Mercedes-AMG ONE: A genuine Formula 1 power unit for the road - utterly unique and uncompromising. In outright terms it is 829 hp against 1049 — a 220 hp gap — and the Ferrari Daytona SP3 reaches 60 mph 0.0s sooner.

Interior & Cabin: Ferrari Daytona SP3 vs Mercedes-AMG ONE

The cabin of the Ferrari Daytona SP3 is a stylistic triumph, heavily influenced by the 1960s prototypes that bear the same name. Alcantara and carbon fibre dominate the cockpit, creating an environment that feels both retro and avant-garde. The seating position is low, and the lack of traditional infotainment screens keeps the driver focused on the mechanical interface. The removable targa roof provides an immersive sensory experience, though this focus on design does necessitate a severe compromise in interior storage. It is arguably the most dramatic interior Ferrari has produced, prioritising theatre over practical storage solutions.

Stepping into the Mercedes-AMG ONE requires a level of agility that mirrors its performance. The cabin is an impossibly compact space, heavily influenced by its racing bloodline, featuring carbon fibre and Alcantara at every turn. Bespoke AMG detailing separates it from any standard luxury vehicle, with focused digital displays providing all necessary telemetry. Ergonomics are entirely dedicated to the pilot, prioritising the driving position above all else. While the build quality is superlative, the interior prioritises function over features, maintaining a minimalist, performance-oriented aesthetic that emphasises the car's singular purpose.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari Daytona SP3 takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 55 against 55. Characteristic of the Ferrari Daytona SP3: Minimalist, motorsport-inspired cockpit true to its Icona-series heritage. For the Mercedes-AMG ONE: F1-inspired cockpit with a genuinely road-legal (if extreme) driving position.

Daily Usability: Ferrari Daytona SP3 vs Mercedes-AMG ONE

Daily utility is clearly not the primary goal of the Ferrari Daytona SP3, yet it manages the realities of modern driving with surprising composure. The inclusion of a nose lift system is vital, allowing this low-slung, wide-bodied machine to traverse driveways and speed bumps that would otherwise be impassable. Luggage capacity is minimal at just 80 litres, meaning it is ill-suited for more than light touring. In city traffic, its extreme width commands attention, turning simple errands into an exercise in precision driving, yet for the few who own one, this lack of practicality is considered an essential part of the charm.

Utility is not a concept the Mercedes-AMG ONE recognises, as it offers virtually no luggage space for the driver or passenger. While the car features an EV-only mode that allows for quiet urban transit, it remains a difficult vehicle to navigate in everyday environments. The standard nose lift is an essential feature, preventing the aggressive splitter from fouling on mundane driveways. While the car is surprisingly manageable during low-speed manoeuvres, it is strictly an exotic machine designed for special occasions, never for the rigours of the daily grind.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari Daytona SP3 takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 25 against 20. Characteristic of the Ferrari Daytona SP3: A pure collector's piece not intended for daily use. For the Mercedes-AMG ONE: Barely usable on the road - engine warm-up and complexity limit daily use. that means 80 litres of boot space against 130, and everyday running costs that favour the Mercedes-AMG ONE at the pumps.

Ownership: Ferrari Daytona SP3 vs Mercedes-AMG ONE

With only 599 units ever produced, the Ferrari Daytona SP3 occupies an elite tier of the collector market. The Icona badge serves as a guarantee of long-term appreciation, placing it among the most sought-after cars in existence. While the initial purchase price is eye-watering, the specialised support from the Ferrari Special Products team ensures that ownership is as frictionless as possible. Maintenance remains a specialist affair, and while the limited production run makes parts and service access exclusive, the SP3 stands as an investment-grade vehicle that transcends traditional automotive cost-benefit analysis.

Ownership of the Mercedes-AMG ONE is an exclusive privilege limited to 275 individuals. The reliance on a highly tuned F1 engine brings unique logistical demands, specifically the need for an engine rebuild every 50,000km, which carries an immense cost. Mercedes-AMG provides a dedicated team of specialists to support these vehicles, ensuring the level of maintenance matches the car's extreme engineering. Given the limited production run and the sheer technical audacity of the project, residual values remain stratospheric, cementing the car's status as a crown jewel in any serious collector's garage.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari Daytona SP3 takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 85 against 80. Characteristic of the Ferrari Daytona SP3: Instant blue-chip collector status as a limited Icona-series Ferrari. For the Mercedes-AMG ONE: The most technically extraordinary hypercar of its generation. On the wallet the two diverge at £6,000,000 versus £3,500,000 — a £2,500,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £0 against £8,000, and warranty cover of 3yr / unlimited mi versus 2yr / unlimited mi.

More comparisons to explore