Ferrari 812 Superfast vs Ferrari F8 Tributo
Compare the Ferrari 812 Superfast vs Ferrari F8 Tributo. The Ferrari F8 Tributo is £60,000 cheaper. The Ferrari F8 Tributo is 0.0s quicker to 60mph. The Ferrari F8 Tributo is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Ferrari 812 Superfast is priced from £275,000, powered by a 6.5L V12, producing 789 hp, with 718 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 211 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The Ferrari F8 Tributo is priced from £268,000, powered by a 3.9L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 710 hp, with 770 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 211 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive.
The Ferrari 812 Superfast offers a 320-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 18 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Ferrari F8 Tributo offers a 200-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 21 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the Ferrari F8 Tributo is £60,000 cheaper than its rival, both require around £3,500 per year in maintenance, the Ferrari F8 Tributo is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £100 for the Ferrari 812 Superfast and £85 for the Ferrari F8 Tributo.
Driving Character: Ferrari 812 Superfast vs Ferrari F8 Tributo
The Ferrari 812 Superfast delivers a visceral, raw experience defined by its 789hp naturally aspirated V12. The steering is exceptionally sharp, requiring precise inputs to manage the power delivery to the rear wheels, aided significantly by the rear-wheel steering system. It excels at high speeds but demands total focus as the limits of adhesion are tested. The chassis balance is classic front-engine GT, though the weight of the drivetrain is always apparent. It is a car that rewards a disciplined driver while punishing complacency, especially on damp British tarmac where the torque can easily overwhelm the traction control.
The Ferrari F8 Tributo represents the zenith of the mid-engine V8 lineage, balancing 710hp with a chassis that feels telepathic. It offers immense, exploitable grip, though the sheer power delivery requires a disciplined hand. The steering is light but incredibly communicative, allowing the driver to place the nose with pinpoint precision through mid-corner transitions. Ride quality remains surprisingly compliant for such a potent platform, yet it never masks the mechanical intensity of the engine. It is a car that thrives on commitment, demanding full focus to extract the absolute limit, ultimately rewarding the driver with an experience that feels remarkably connected and raw.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 812 Superfast takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 92 against 92. Characteristic of the Ferrari 812 Superfast: Ferocious naturally-aspirated V12 GT with genuine front-engined drama. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Sharp, communicative handling with blistering turbocharged V8 pace. In outright terms it is 789 hp against 710 — a 79 hp gap — and the Ferrari F8 Tributo reaches 60 mph 0.0s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Ferrari 812 Superfast vs Ferrari F8 Tributo
Inside the 812 Superfast, the cabin prioritises driver focus while retaining an air of grand touring luxury. The architecture features a sweeping dashboard that wraps around the occupant, with high-quality materials and bespoke trim options defining the space. The optional Daytona-style seats offer excellent lateral support for spirited driving, and the driver-centric interface places all essential controls within immediate reach. However, the sheer length of the bonnet remains a persistent factor when navigating tight spaces, necessitating careful judgement of the front extremities despite the high level of interior finish and overall build quality.
Inside, the F8 Tributo strips away unnecessary clutter in favour of a driver-centric environment. It embraces a clean, functional aesthetic where materials are high-grade and tactile. The integration of modern tech, including standard Apple CarPlay, represents a significant leap forward compared to its predecessors. While the cabin is intimate, the ergonomics are spot-on, putting every vital control within easy reach of the steering wheel. It is not designed for grand touring, however, and the limited luggage space highlights its primary focus on short, sharp bursts of driving pleasure rather than extended road trips.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 812 Superfast takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 80 against 78. Characteristic of the Ferrari 812 Superfast: Well-finished, driver-focused cabin. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Driver-focused cabin with strong build quality.
Daily Usability: Ferrari 812 Superfast vs Ferrari F8 Tributo
For such a potent machine, the Ferrari 812 Superfast is surprisingly civilised as a long-distance companion. The 320-litre boot provides adequate space for luggage, making it the most practical front-engine offering in the modern Ferrari hierarchy. While it is perfectly comfortable over long motorway stints thanks to the compliant suspension settings, its width and length make urban manoeuvrability a chore. It demands constant vigilance in narrow city streets, yet it handles parking ramps and standard errands with enough grace to allow for genuine usability, provided the driver is prepared to manage its substantial dimensions.
For such an aggressive machine, the Ferrari F8 Tributo displays unexpected manners during low-speed transit. Magnetorheological dampers effectively smooth out broken asphalt, making it perfectly usable for occasional town work if one exercises caution with the width. Parking is a manageable task, though the rearward visibility reminds the owner of its mid-engine configuration. It is relatively compact by modern supercar standards, which aids in navigating tighter roads, yet the modest storage capacity effectively limits its utility to the basics. It functions as a versatile toy, rather than a multipurpose tool, for those who value performance above practical cargo requirements.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari F8 Tributo takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 58 against 60. Characteristic of the Ferrari 812 Superfast: Usable GT for longer journeys, if firmly sprung. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Usable as an occasional daily supercar. that means 320 litres of boot space against 200, and everyday running costs that favour the Ferrari F8 Tributo at the pumps.
Ownership: Ferrari 812 Superfast vs Ferrari F8 Tributo
As one of the final front-engined, naturally aspirated V12 masterpieces, the 812 Superfast enjoys a sterling reputation among collectors. Residual values remain robust, supported by the car's status as a pinnacle of traditional Ferrari engineering. Ownership costs, however, are substantial, with specialist maintenance required to keep the complex V12 running at peak performance. While annual service costs are significant, the peace of mind offered by professional maintenance is essential for preserving the vehicle's long-term value, as enthusiasts continue to favour these unadulterated powerplants over the industry’s shift toward smaller displacement and electrification.
As the final pure, non-hybrid V8, the Ferrari F8 Tributo occupies a unique space in the marque’s history. Values are currently climbing, cementing its status as an essential collector’s item for enthusiasts of internal combustion. While it offers a three-year unlimited mileage warranty, prospective owners should be mindful that official servicing options at authorised dealers are becoming more constrained as production models phase out. Insurance premiums are significant, reflecting the car's extreme performance profile and the rarity of its components, making it a purchase that requires careful financial planning to maintain properly over the long term.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari F8 Tributo takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 72 against 76. Characteristic of the Ferrari 812 Superfast: Strong Ferrari reliability reputation for a modern V12 GT. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Strong reliability reputation among modern Ferraris. On the wallet the two diverge at £275,000 versus £268,000 — a £7,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £3,500 against £0.