Ferrari 296 GTB vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

Compare the Ferrari 296 GTB vs Ferrari F8 Tributo. The Ferrari F8 Tributo is £16,000 cheaper. The Ferrari F8 Tributo is 0.0s quicker to 60mph. The Ferrari 296 GTB is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.

The Ferrari 296 GTB is priced from £241,000, powered by a 3.0L V6 Hybrid, producing 819 hp, with 740 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 205 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The Ferrari F8 Tributo is priced from £268,000, powered by a 3.9L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 710 hp, with 770 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 211 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive.

The Ferrari 296 GTB offers a 105-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol hybrid, returns around 35 mpg, is covered by a 7yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Ferrari F8 Tributo offers a 200-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 21 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.

On cost of ownership, the Ferrari F8 Tributo is £16,000 cheaper than its rival, both require around £0 per year in maintenance, the Ferrari 296 GTB is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £75 for the Ferrari 296 GTB and £85 for the Ferrari F8 Tributo.

Driving Character: Ferrari 296 GTB vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

The Ferrari 296 GTB redefines mid-engine dynamics by integrating a hybrid system that provides instantaneous torque fill, effectively eliminating turbo lag. The chassis feels remarkably nimble, with the weight added by the battery and electric motor expertly masked by sophisticated suspension tuning. Steering is razor-sharp and communicative, allowing the driver to place the car with immense confidence. While the transition between electric power and the combustion engine is generally seamless, spirited driving reveals a character that demands a precise hand on the throttle to manage the immediate surge of combined hybrid torque.

The Ferrari F8 Tributo represents the zenith of the mid-engine V8 lineage, balancing 710hp with a chassis that feels telepathic. It offers immense, exploitable grip, though the sheer power delivery requires a disciplined hand. The steering is light but incredibly communicative, allowing the driver to place the nose with pinpoint precision through mid-corner transitions. Ride quality remains surprisingly compliant for such a potent platform, yet it never masks the mechanical intensity of the engine. It is a car that thrives on commitment, demanding full focus to extract the absolute limit, ultimately rewarding the driver with an experience that feels remarkably connected and raw.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 296 GTB takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 93 against 92. Characteristic of the Ferrari 296 GTB: Sublime hybrid V6 chassis balance, widely rated among the best-handling Ferraris. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Sharp, communicative handling with blistering turbocharged V8 pace. In outright terms it is 819 hp against 710 — a 109 hp gap — and the Ferrari F8 Tributo reaches 60 mph 0.0s sooner.

Interior & Cabin: Ferrari 296 GTB vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

The cabin prioritises driver focus through a high-tech, cockpit-style layout. High-quality carbon fibre and premium leather define the interior, creating an environment that feels both sophisticated and purposeful. The reliance on digital controls and haptic surfaces represents a significant departure from traditional analogue switchgear, which, while offering a modern and clean aesthetic, may feel less tactile for enthusiasts accustomed to physical buttons. Visibility is typical of a mid-engine exotic, with the digital instrument cluster providing all necessary telemetry without overwhelming the driver, successfully balancing technological advancement with essential driver-focused ergonomics.

Inside, the F8 Tributo strips away unnecessary clutter in favour of a driver-centric environment. It embraces a clean, functional aesthetic where materials are high-grade and tactile. The integration of modern tech, including standard Apple CarPlay, represents a significant leap forward compared to its predecessors. While the cabin is intimate, the ergonomics are spot-on, putting every vital control within easy reach of the steering wheel. It is not designed for grand touring, however, and the limited luggage space highlights its primary focus on short, sharp bursts of driving pleasure rather than extended road trips.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 296 GTB takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 78 against 78. Characteristic of the Ferrari 296 GTB: Driver-focused cabin, though haptic controls polarise reviewers. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Driver-focused cabin with strong build quality.

Daily Usability: Ferrari 296 GTB vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

For a mid-engine supercar, the 296 GTB is surprisingly well-adapted to urban living, thanks in large part to its EV-only mode. Being able to creep silently through residential areas provides a level of refinement rarely found in this segment. The compact dimensions make it relatively easy to place on narrower roads, though the car’s very low ground clearance demands constant vigilance against steep driveways and deep kerbs. While rear visibility is admittedly restricted, the car handles the realities of city traffic with far more grace than its V8-powered predecessors.

For such an aggressive machine, the Ferrari F8 Tributo displays unexpected manners during low-speed transit. Magnetorheological dampers effectively smooth out broken asphalt, making it perfectly usable for occasional town work if one exercises caution with the width. Parking is a manageable task, though the rearward visibility reminds the owner of its mid-engine configuration. It is relatively compact by modern supercar standards, which aids in navigating tighter roads, yet the modest storage capacity effectively limits its utility to the basics. It functions as a versatile toy, rather than a multipurpose tool, for those who value performance above practical cargo requirements.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 296 GTB takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 68 against 60. Characteristic of the Ferrari 296 GTB: More usable daily than a 12Cilindri, with some EV-only running. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Usable as an occasional daily supercar. that means 105 litres of boot space against 200, plus a usable front boot in the Ferrari 296 GTB, and everyday running costs that favour the Ferrari 296 GTB at the pumps.

Ownership: Ferrari 296 GTB vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

Ferrari’s support network ensures that owning a 296 GTB remains a premium, discreet experience. The 7-year warranty and inclusive service plan are critical components that bolster confidence in a powertrain that incorporates significant hybrid complexity. While long-term durability regarding the electrical system remains less battle-tested than that of traditional internal combustion models, the brand's commitment to the longevity of the platform provides peace of mind. Running costs are competitive for the supercar class, and the high-tech appeal ensures it remains a desirable prospect on the secondary market.

As the final pure, non-hybrid V8, the Ferrari F8 Tributo occupies a unique space in the marque’s history. Values are currently climbing, cementing its status as an essential collector’s item for enthusiasts of internal combustion. While it offers a three-year unlimited mileage warranty, prospective owners should be mindful that official servicing options at authorised dealers are becoming more constrained as production models phase out. Insurance premiums are significant, reflecting the car's extreme performance profile and the rarity of its components, making it a purchase that requires careful financial planning to maintain properly over the long term.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari F8 Tributo takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 70 against 76. Characteristic of the Ferrari 296 GTB: Strong demand and Ferrari's modern reliability improvements. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Strong reliability reputation among modern Ferraris. On the wallet the two diverge at £241,000 versus £268,000 — a £27,000 difference, and warranty cover of 7yr / unlimited mi versus 3yr / unlimited mi.

More comparisons to explore