Lamborghini Huracán vs Ferrari 296 GTB
Compare the Lamborghini Huracán vs Ferrari 296 GTB. The Lamborghini Huracán is £33,000 cheaper. The Ferrari 296 GTB is 0.0s quicker to 60mph. The Ferrari 296 GTB is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Lamborghini Huracán is priced from £208,000, powered by a 5.2L V10, producing 631 hp, with 600 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 202 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive. The Ferrari 296 GTB is priced from £241,000, powered by a 3.0L V6 Hybrid, producing 819 hp, with 740 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 205 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive.
The Lamborghini Huracán offers a 100-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol, returns around 18 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Ferrari 296 GTB offers a 105-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol hybrid, returns around 35 mpg, is covered by a 7yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the Lamborghini Huracán is £33,000 cheaper than its rival, both require around £3,200 per year in maintenance, the Ferrari 296 GTB is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £90 for the Lamborghini Huracán and £75 for the Ferrari 296 GTB.
Driving Character: Lamborghini Huracán vs Ferrari 296 GTB
The Lamborghini Huracán excels through the visceral, linear delivery of its 5.2L naturally aspirated V10. It feels sharp and immediate, providing an emotional connection at high revolutions that turbocharged rivals often struggle to replicate. The all-wheel-drive system provides exceptional traction, allowing for confident deployment of 631 hp across varied conditions, though it does isolate the driver slightly compared to pure rear-wheel-drive platforms. It remains a masterclass in approachable performance, offering a chassis that feels inherently balanced, even if the steering lacks the final degree of granular, communicative feedback found in track-focused alternatives.
The Ferrari 296 GTB redefines mid-engine dynamics by integrating a hybrid system that provides instantaneous torque fill, effectively eliminating turbo lag. The chassis feels remarkably nimble, with the weight added by the battery and electric motor expertly masked by sophisticated suspension tuning. Steering is razor-sharp and communicative, allowing the driver to place the car with immense confidence. While the transition between electric power and the combustion engine is generally seamless, spirited driving reveals a character that demands a precise hand on the throttle to manage the immediate surge of combined hybrid torque.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 296 GTB takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 90 against 93. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Huracán: High-revving naturally-aspirated V10 with confidence-inspiring AWD grip. For the Ferrari 296 GTB: Sublime hybrid V6 chassis balance, widely rated among the best-handling Ferraris. In outright terms it is 631 hp against 819 — a 188 hp gap — and the Ferrari 296 GTB reaches 60 mph 0.0s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Lamborghini Huracán vs Ferrari 296 GTB
Stepping into the Lamborghini Huracán feels like entering a fighter jet cockpit, defined by aggressive angles and a bold, dramatic aesthetic. The material quality is exemplary, featuring high-grade leathers and tactile switches that reinforce the car’s premium positioning. While the infotainment is functional and modern, some controls require a learning curve to navigate efficiently. The cabin is undeniably snug, and taller occupants may find headroom restricted by the aggressive roofline. Nevertheless, the layout remains focused entirely on the pilot, creating an immersive environment that justifies the car’s aggressive exterior posture.
The cabin prioritises driver focus through a high-tech, cockpit-style layout. High-quality carbon fibre and premium leather define the interior, creating an environment that feels both sophisticated and purposeful. The reliance on digital controls and haptic surfaces represents a significant departure from traditional analogue switchgear, which, while offering a modern and clean aesthetic, may feel less tactile for enthusiasts accustomed to physical buttons. Visibility is typical of a mid-engine exotic, with the digital instrument cluster providing all necessary telemetry without overwhelming the driver, successfully balancing technological advancement with essential driver-focused ergonomics.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 296 GTB takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 76 against 78. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Huracán: Dramatic, driver-focused cabin with strong build quality. For the Ferrari 296 GTB: Driver-focused cabin, though haptic controls polarise reviewers.
Daily Usability: Lamborghini Huracán vs Ferrari 296 GTB
For a mid-engined supercar, the Lamborghini Huracán offers surprising urban manners. The all-wheel-drive system provides an all-weather advantage that makes the car feel more usable for daily errands than its rear-driven counterparts. While front visibility is respectable for this segment, the wide rear haunches and the car’s inherent low stance demand careful navigation of tight streets, causing genuine kerb anxiety in congested areas. The front storage compartment is useful for light luggage, but the 100-litre boot capacity remains a limiting factor for longer touring trips, confirming its status as a high-performance weekend specialist.
For a mid-engine supercar, the 296 GTB is surprisingly well-adapted to urban living, thanks in large part to its EV-only mode. Being able to creep silently through residential areas provides a level of refinement rarely found in this segment. The compact dimensions make it relatively easy to place on narrower roads, though the car’s very low ground clearance demands constant vigilance against steep driveways and deep kerbs. While rear visibility is admittedly restricted, the car handles the realities of city traffic with far more grace than its V8-powered predecessors.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 296 GTB takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 55 against 68. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Huracán: Usable as an occasional daily supercar. For the Ferrari 296 GTB: More usable daily than a 12Cilindri, with some EV-only running. that means 100 litres of boot space against 105, and everyday running costs that favour the Ferrari 296 GTB at the pumps.
Ownership: Lamborghini Huracán vs Ferrari 296 GTB
The ownership experience for the Lamborghini Huracán is buoyed by a passionate, global community and a robust dealer network that understands the nuances of the 5.2L V10. While the unlimited mileage warranty provides initial peace of mind, owners must account for high annual maintenance costs of £3,200. The V10 engine requires frequent, meticulous attention, with oil change intervals that are shorter than those of mass-market luxury competitors. Residual values remain stable, supported by the Huracán's iconic status, but potential buyers should budget accordingly for the premium associated with maintaining such a sophisticated high-revving machine.
Ferrari’s support network ensures that owning a 296 GTB remains a premium, discreet experience. The 7-year warranty and inclusive service plan are critical components that bolster confidence in a powertrain that incorporates significant hybrid complexity. While long-term durability regarding the electrical system remains less battle-tested than that of traditional internal combustion models, the brand's commitment to the longevity of the platform provides peace of mind. Running costs are competitive for the supercar class, and the high-tech appeal ensures it remains a desirable prospect on the secondary market.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Huracán takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 78 against 70. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Huracán: Strong reliability reputation, widely regarded as an easy-to-live-with supercar. For the Ferrari 296 GTB: Strong demand and Ferrari's modern reliability improvements. On the wallet the two diverge at £208,000 versus £241,000 — a £33,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £3,200 against £0, and warranty cover of 3yr / unlimited mi versus 7yr / unlimited mi.