Lamborghini Gallardo vs Aston Martin DBX707
Compare the Lamborghini Gallardo vs Aston Martin DBX707. The Lamborghini Gallardo is £65,000 cheaper. The Aston Martin DBX707 is 0.1s quicker to 60mph. The Aston Martin DBX707 is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Lamborghini Gallardo is priced from £95,000, powered by a 5.2L V10, producing 552 hp, with 540 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.4s, a top speed of 202 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive. The Aston Martin DBX707 is priced from £210,000, powered by a 4.0L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 707 hp, with 900 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.3s, a top speed of 193 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive.
The Lamborghini Gallardo offers a 110-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol, returns around 19 mpg, is covered by a 2yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Aston Martin DBX707 offers a 632-litre boot, folding rear seats, runs on petrol, returns around 21 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the Lamborghini Gallardo is £65,000 cheaper than its rival, the Aston Martin DBX707 costs less in annual maintenance (£3,000 versus £1,700), the Aston Martin DBX707 is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £85 for the Lamborghini Gallardo and £100 for the Aston Martin DBX707.
Driving Character: Lamborghini Gallardo vs Aston Martin DBX707
The Lamborghini Gallardo defines the modern entry into the V10 exotic segment, offering a willing, high-revving engine that provides an unforgettable auditory experience. The LP560-generation all-wheel-drive system provides immense mechanical grip, allowing for confident deployment of power even in variable road conditions. While the chassis lacks the adaptive electronic damping and sophisticated geometry of modern successors, it remains tactile and communicative. Gear shifts, particularly in early models, require an adjustment to the single-clutch robotic system, but the connection between the throttle and the rear wheels provides a rewarding, if demanding, driving dynamic.
The DBX707 redefines the expectations of a luxury SUV, injecting 707hp of twin-turbo V8 fury into a high-riding chassis that refuses to behave like a typical utility vehicle. With its intelligent all-wheel-drive system and electronic rear differential, it manages to put its immense power down with surprising effectiveness. While it possesses remarkable grip, the physics of its 5071 lbs weight inevitably surface during aggressive cornering. The nine-speed wet-clutch gearbox is snappy, providing gear changes that feel purposeful and sharp, allowing the driver to exploit the engine's 900Nm of torque to its absolute limit with confidence and speed.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Gallardo takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 82 against 78. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Gallardo: The car that made Lamborghini ownership genuinely usable, with strong V10 character. For the Aston Martin DBX707: Startlingly quick and composed for a two-tonne-plus SUV. In outright terms it is 552 hp against 707 — a 155 hp gap — and the Aston Martin DBX707 reaches 60 mph 0.1s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Lamborghini Gallardo vs Aston Martin DBX707
The cabin is compact and purposeful, reflecting a design era where ergonomics were focused solely on the driving task. The seating position is low, connecting the driver directly to the car's movements, while the materials feel durable despite their age. The infotainment system is rudimentary by contemporary standards, often seen as a secondary component to the primary task of driving. While it lacks the expansive glass and digital displays found in today's exotics, the Gallardo’s cockpit is refreshingly simple, providing an unobstructed focus on the road ahead without the distraction of overly complex menus or digital interfaces.
The interior of the DBX707 is a masterclass in performance luxury, featuring bespoke sport seats and Alcantara detailing that separates it from the standard model. It offers genuine, spacious accommodation for four adults, ensuring that performance does not come at the expense of passenger comfort. However, when compared to the ultra-modern interfaces of the Cayenne or the Urus, the cabin tech feels slightly behind the curve. While the build quality is superb and the materials are quintessentially British, the infotainment system lacks the cutting-edge fluidity of its most direct rivals at this price point.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Aston Martin DBX707 takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 65 against 85. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Gallardo: Solid, driver-focused cabin typical of mid-2000s Lamborghini. For the Aston Martin DBX707: Lavish, driver-focused cabin unlike most performance SUV rivals.
Daily Usability: Lamborghini Gallardo vs Aston Martin DBX707
As a more compact option than the contemporary V12 flagships, the Gallardo is significantly easier to navigate in urban environments. The footprint is manageable for tight spaces, and the visibility is surprisingly clear compared to the Aventador. While the suspension in the LP560 trim is relatively stiff, making for a jarring experience on poor roads, it is entirely viable for errands and weekend trips. The presence of a usable, albeit small, luggage compartment in the front adds a layer of practicality that distinguishes it from more extreme, limited-edition hypercars of the same era.
Practicality is the DBX707’s greatest asset, boasting a 632-litre boot that makes it a legitimate family vehicle capable of swallowing luggage with ease. Its air suspension system with adaptive dampers allows the car to switch seamlessly between a composed, comfortable cruiser and a stiffened, responsive performance machine. While fuel economy is inevitably poor at 21mpg, the trade-off is a level of versatility rarely seen in such a powerful vehicle. It is a car that thrives on variety, handling the school run and high-speed motorways with equal parts ease and effortless, explosive capability.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Aston Martin DBX707 takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 60 against 82. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Gallardo: Widely regarded as the most usable classic Lamborghini for daily use. For the Aston Martin DBX707: Genuinely practical family SUV with supercar-baiting pace. that means 110 litres of boot space against 632, plus a usable front boot in the Lamborghini Gallardo, and everyday running costs that favour the Aston Martin DBX707 at the pumps.
Ownership: Lamborghini Gallardo vs Aston Martin DBX707
Gallardo ownership is a gateway to the Lamborghini brand, supported by a wide and well-established network of independent specialists. This accessibility helps in managing maintenance costs, which are significantly lower than those associated with V12 models. While parts remain relatively easy to source, the age of the platform necessitates regular, thorough health checks, particularly regarding the drivetrain and electronic systems. Values have stabilised, making it an attractive proposition for those entering the exotic market, though prospective owners should prioritise vehicles with complete service histories to avoid the potential pitfalls of older exotics.
Maintaining a DBX707 is a manageable affair compared to its more exclusive siblings, thanks to the expansion of the Aston Martin dealer network and improved service accessibility. Demand for the vehicle on the used market is robust, driven by the growing appetite for high-performance SUVs, though early depreciation remains a factor for first owners. Tyre costs are significant given the car’s weight and performance, and owners must prepare for the regular attention required by such a high-output platform. Overall, it serves as a reliable, albeit premium-cost, flagship for those needing utility with a supercar-killing powertrain.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Gallardo takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 68 against 62. Characteristic of the Lamborghini Gallardo: Now an accessible modern-classic entry point to Lamborghini ownership. For the Aston Martin DBX707: Strong demand keeps residuals healthy. On the wallet the two diverge at £95,000 versus £210,000 — a £115,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £3,000 against £1,700, and warranty cover of 2yr / unlimited mi versus 3yr / unlimited mi.