Ferrari Roma vs McLaren Artura
Compare the Ferrari Roma vs McLaren Artura. The McLaren Artura is £0 cheaper. The McLaren Artura is 0.4s quicker to 60mph. The McLaren Artura is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Ferrari Roma is priced from £195,000, powered by a 3.9L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 612 hp, with 760 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.4s, a top speed of 199 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The McLaren Artura is priced from £195,000, powered by a 3.0L V6 Hybrid, producing 671 hp, with 720 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3s, a top speed of 205 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive.
The Ferrari Roma offers a 272-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 24 mpg, is covered by a 7yr / unlimited mi warranty. The McLaren Artura offers a 188-litre boot, runs on petrol hybrid, returns around 42 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the McLaren Artura is £0 cheaper than its rival, both require around £0 per year in maintenance, the McLaren Artura is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £85 for the Ferrari Roma and £70 for the McLaren Artura.
Driving Character: Ferrari Roma vs McLaren Artura
The Ferrari Roma is designed for the modern gentleman, offering a 3.9L Twin-Turbo V8 that favours refined, broad-shouldered power over the erratic spikes of a track weapon. Its chassis is balanced and fluid, encouraging long, spirited drives across country roads rather than focused track sessions. The steering is direct, yet it avoids the twitchiness found in more aggressive models, providing a relaxing pace that feels perfectly weighted. While it can certainly deliver when provoked, the Roma’s true nature is discovered in its ability to maintain high speeds with a sense of poise and composure that is rarely found in grand tourers.
The McLaren Artura marks a pivotal shift toward electrification without sacrificing the brand's legendary dynamic purity. Built upon the bespoke carbon fibre monocoque, it exhibits a level of chassis rigidity that translates into exceptionally sharp turn-in and predictable mid-corner balance. The V6 hybrid powertrain provides immediate, torque-rich acceleration, effectively eliminating the turbo-lag issues associated with older designs. While the transition between electric and internal combustion modes is generally seamless, the sheer complexity of the drivetrain can occasionally make the power delivery feel less telepathic than the pure mechanical V8s of the past, though it remains a formidable track weapon.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the McLaren Artura takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 78 against 88. Characteristic of the Ferrari Roma: Elegant, GT-focused dynamics rather than outright sports car sharpness. For the McLaren Artura: McLaren's first series hybrid - sharp, rewarding, and genuinely road-focused. In outright terms it is 612 hp against 671 — a 59 hp gap — and the McLaren Artura reaches 60 mph 0.4s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Ferrari Roma vs McLaren Artura
The cabin of the Roma is arguably the most elegant interior Ferrari has produced in recent memory. It creates a cocoon-like atmosphere with a 2+ layout that is refined, focusing on high-quality tactile materials rather than just performance metrics. Tech is present, though the infotainment is less cutting-edge than the ultra-modern SF90, which feels appropriate for a car intended for long-distance comfort. The rear seats are suitable for short journeys or extra storage, providing a level of practicality that is often missing from its siblings. It feels like a space designed for the journey, not just for the destination.
Inside, the Artura discards the cluttered ergonomics of previous models in favour of a cleaner, more focused cockpit environment. The interior design successfully integrates modern technology, featuring a crisp digital instrument cluster and a responsive infotainment system that finally feels contemporary. Build quality is improved, with tactile materials and a refined aesthetic that suits its high-tech brief. However, the cabin remains undeniably snug; taller drivers may find head and shoulder room restricted, and the relative lack of integrated storage space serves as a blunt reminder that this remains a performance-first machine rather than a grand tourer.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari Roma takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 85 against 78. Characteristic of the Ferrari Roma: Beautifully designed, minimalist 2+2 cabin. For the McLaren Artura: Modern, tech-forward cockpit with genuine daily usability.
Daily Usability: Ferrari Roma vs McLaren Artura
For those seeking an everyday Ferrari, the Roma is the standout choice. The 272-litre boot is impressively sized for a front-engine coupe, easily handling luggage for a weekend away. Its longer wheelbase and softer suspension settings make it remarkably comfortable for long hauls, smoothing out road imperfections that would typically unsettle a mid-engine model. In town, it is manageable, although its width still requires care in tight parking structures. Overall, it succeeds as a practical daily driver, balancing enough performance to thrill with the civility required for everyday chores and commutes, making it the most usable model currently available.
For a mid-engined supercar, the Artura manages urban environments with surprising grace, largely thanks to its EV-only mode, which allows for silent, emissions-free operation in city centres. Standard nose lift functionality further enhances its daily utility, enabling the car to negotiate speed bumps and steep inclines without anxiety. While the ride quality is undeniably firm in Sport settings, it remains compliant enough for moderate journeys. The primary trade-off for this hybrid functionality is the space sacrificed to house the battery pack, which reduces luggage capacity and necessitates careful packing for any extended weekend getaway.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the McLaren Artura takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 75 against 78. Characteristic of the Ferrari Roma: Ferrari's most usable, comfortable everyday GT. For the McLaren Artura: Widely reported as a genuinely daily-usable hybrid supercar. that means 272 litres of boot space against 188, and everyday running costs that favour the McLaren Artura at the pumps.
Ownership: Ferrari Roma vs McLaren Artura
The Roma is well-supported by Ferrari’s seven-year warranty, providing exceptional peace of mind for those looking to use the car frequently. It is positioned to attract a broader demographic of buyers, including those who may not want a dedicated mid-engine sports car. While residual values are slightly softer than the more extreme models in the lineup due to its status as a grand tourer, the lower cost of maintenance makes it an attractive proposition for long-term ownership. It is an honest, well-engineered vehicle that serves as a solid foundation for those looking to enter the Ferrari ownership experience.
Ownership of the Artura places the driver at the forefront of McLaren's electrification strategy, supported by a comprehensive warranty that covers the hybrid components—a vital safeguard for a new platform. Initial demand remains high, reinforcing its status as a significant milestone in the manufacturer's history. While annual maintenance costs are reflective of its hyper-performance engineering, the dealer network remains well-versed in the requirements of the new hybrid systems. Long-term durability is the only real question mark for prospective buyers, given the inherent complexity of the hybrid setup compared to the brand's historically mechanical V8 engines.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari Roma takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 74 against 65. Characteristic of the Ferrari Roma: Strong reliability reputation among modern Ferraris. For the McLaren Artura: Improving reliability reputation as software updates mature. On the wallet the two diverge at £195,000 versus £195,000 — a £0 difference, with annual maintenance of £0 against £2,800, and warranty cover of 7yr / unlimited mi versus 3yr / unlimited mi.