Ferrari 296 GTB vs Lamborghini Revuelto

Compare the Ferrari 296 GTB vs Lamborghini Revuelto. The Ferrari 296 GTB is £184,000 cheaper. The Lamborghini Revuelto is 0.4s quicker to 60mph. The Ferrari 296 GTB is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.

The Ferrari 296 GTB is priced from £241,000, powered by a 3.0L V6 Hybrid, producing 819 hp, with 740 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 205 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The Lamborghini Revuelto is priced from £425,000, powered by a 6.5L V12 Hybrid, producing 1001 hp, with 850 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.5s, a top speed of 217 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive.

The Ferrari 296 GTB offers a 105-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on petrol hybrid, returns around 35 mpg, is covered by a 7yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Lamborghini Revuelto offers a 100-litre boot, runs on petrol hybrid, returns around 25 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.

On cost of ownership, the Ferrari 296 GTB is £184,000 cheaper than its rival, both require around £0 per year in maintenance, the Ferrari 296 GTB is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £75 for the Ferrari 296 GTB and £95 for the Lamborghini Revuelto.

Driving Character: Ferrari 296 GTB vs Lamborghini Revuelto

The Ferrari 296 GTB redefines mid-engine dynamics by integrating a hybrid system that provides instantaneous torque fill, effectively eliminating turbo lag. The chassis feels remarkably nimble, with the weight added by the battery and electric motor expertly masked by sophisticated suspension tuning. Steering is razor-sharp and communicative, allowing the driver to place the car with immense confidence. While the transition between electric power and the combustion engine is generally seamless, spirited driving reveals a character that demands a precise hand on the throttle to manage the immediate surge of combined hybrid torque.

The Lamborghini Revuelto is a technical tour de force, pushing the boundaries of what a V12 flagship can achieve. By integrating a hybrid system, it provides a staggering 1001 hp, with three electric motors allowing for torque vectoring that completely transforms how the car rotates in a bend. While the weight penalty of the battery pack is significant, the chassis remains surprisingly poised, hiding its mass through sheer electronic wizardry. It feels incredibly futuristic, offering an acceleration profile that is violent and instant, yet it manages to retain the high-rpm scream that defines the Lamborghini V12 heritage.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Revuelto takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 93 against 95. Characteristic of the Ferrari 296 GTB: Sublime hybrid V6 chassis balance, widely rated among the best-handling Ferraris. For the Lamborghini Revuelto: Lamborghini's first series hybrid V12 - explosive, dramatic, and cutting-edge. In outright terms it is 819 hp against 1001 — a 182 hp gap — and the Lamborghini Revuelto reaches 60 mph 0.4s sooner.

Interior & Cabin: Ferrari 296 GTB vs Lamborghini Revuelto

The cabin prioritises driver focus through a high-tech, cockpit-style layout. High-quality carbon fibre and premium leather define the interior, creating an environment that feels both sophisticated and purposeful. The reliance on digital controls and haptic surfaces represents a significant departure from traditional analogue switchgear, which, while offering a modern and clean aesthetic, may feel less tactile for enthusiasts accustomed to physical buttons. Visibility is typical of a mid-engine exotic, with the digital instrument cluster providing all necessary telemetry without overwhelming the driver, successfully balancing technological advancement with essential driver-focused ergonomics.

The interior of the Lamborghini Revuelto reflects a paradigm shift for the brand, placing digital capability at the forefront while retaining a deeply mechanical, carbon-fibre-rich aesthetic. The layout is compact, mirroring the intimacy of the Aventador, but with an improved HMI that feels far more responsive and logical. Alcantara and lightweight composites provide a luxury feel that is nonetheless focused on reducing every possible gram. The interface is driver-focused, using high-resolution screens to manage the complex hybrid powertrain, ensuring that even with all the added technology, the pilot remains the central point of the experience.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Revuelto takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 78 against 82. Characteristic of the Ferrari 296 GTB: Driver-focused cabin, though haptic controls polarise reviewers. For the Lamborghini Revuelto: Modern, tech-forward cabin with genuine usability improvements.

Daily Usability: Ferrari 296 GTB vs Lamborghini Revuelto

For a mid-engine supercar, the 296 GTB is surprisingly well-adapted to urban living, thanks in large part to its EV-only mode. Being able to creep silently through residential areas provides a level of refinement rarely found in this segment. The compact dimensions make it relatively easy to place on narrower roads, though the car’s very low ground clearance demands constant vigilance against steep driveways and deep kerbs. While rear visibility is admittedly restricted, the car handles the realities of city traffic with far more grace than its V8-powered predecessors.

For such a potent hypercar, the Lamborghini Revuelto offers a unique urban advantage: a silent, electric-only mode for short-range commuting. This quiet capability makes leaving home early or navigating dense city traffic far less intrusive than in previous V12 models. While the car remains wide and requires careful positioning, features like the standard nose lift system significantly improve its practicality on real-world roads. The boot space is minimal, and the hybrid system is tuned primarily for performance rather than long-range EV utility, yet it remains significantly more versatile than the V12 monsters of the past.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 296 GTB takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 68 against 55. Characteristic of the Ferrari 296 GTB: More usable daily than a 12Cilindri, with some EV-only running. For the Lamborghini Revuelto: More usable than past V12 Lamborghinis thanks to EV-only running. that means 105 litres of boot space against 100, plus a usable front boot in the Ferrari 296 GTB, and everyday running costs that favour the Ferrari 296 GTB at the pumps.

Ownership: Ferrari 296 GTB vs Lamborghini Revuelto

Ferrari’s support network ensures that owning a 296 GTB remains a premium, discreet experience. The 7-year warranty and inclusive service plan are critical components that bolster confidence in a powertrain that incorporates significant hybrid complexity. While long-term durability regarding the electrical system remains less battle-tested than that of traditional internal combustion models, the brand's commitment to the longevity of the platform provides peace of mind. Running costs are competitive for the supercar class, and the high-tech appeal ensures it remains a desirable prospect on the secondary market.

Owning a Lamborghini Revuelto is an exercise in exclusivity. With a new price point of £425,000 and limited production, it is a high-demand model that is likely to appreciate or hold value well. The ownership programme includes a warranty that specifically covers the hybrid components, which is crucial given the complexity of the powertrain. Annual maintenance is budgeted at £4,000, reflecting the need for manufacturer-trained specialists to handle the V12-hybrid synergy. It is a complex machine, but the support network provided ensures that this technological leap remains a viable proposition for the elite supercar collector.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari 296 GTB takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 70 against 68. Characteristic of the Ferrari 296 GTB: Strong demand and Ferrari's modern reliability improvements. For the Lamborghini Revuelto: Strong demand as Lamborghini's new flagship hybrid supercar. On the wallet the two diverge at £241,000 versus £425,000 — a £184,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £0 against £4,000, and warranty cover of 7yr / unlimited mi versus 3yr / unlimited mi.

More comparisons to explore