Audi RS e-tron GT vs Lamborghini Urus
Compare the Audi RS e-tron GT vs Lamborghini Urus. The Audi RS e-tron GT is £60,000 cheaper. The Audi RS e-tron GT is 0.5s quicker to 60mph. The Audi RS e-tron GT is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.
The Audi RS e-tron GT is priced from £125,000, powered by a Dual Electric Motors, producing 637 hp, with 830 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.1s, a top speed of 155 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive. The Lamborghini Urus is priced from £185,000, powered by a 4.0L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 641 hp, with 850 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.6s, a top speed of 190 mph, sent to the road via all-wheel drive.
The Audi RS e-tron GT offers a 405-litre boot, a usable front boot, runs on electric, returns around 76 mpg, is covered by a 4yr / 50k mi warranty. The Lamborghini Urus offers a 616-litre boot, folding rear seats, runs on petrol, returns around 17 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.
On cost of ownership, the Audi RS e-tron GT is £60,000 cheaper than its rival, the Audi RS e-tron GT costs less in annual maintenance (£1,000 versus £2,500), the Audi RS e-tron GT is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £15 for the Audi RS e-tron GT and £100 for the Lamborghini Urus.
Driving Character: Audi RS e-tron GT vs Lamborghini Urus
The RS e-tron GT leverages 637 hp and instant electric torque to deliver breathtaking acceleration, pinning occupants to their seats with brutal efficiency. The low centre of gravity provided by the battery pack ensures the car remains impressively flat through corners, though the sheer weight of 5139 lbs is occasionally felt in tighter, technical transitions. It lacks the raw, emotive soundtrack of a combustion-engined rival, but compensates with a refined, futuristic chassis that makes covering ground effortless. The two-speed rear gearbox provides a unique mechanical feel, bridging the gap between electric immediacy and high-speed stability.
The Lamborghini Urus redefines the performance SUV segment with its 4.0L twin-turbo V8, delivering acceleration that feels alien in such a heavy vehicle. The ANIMA selector is the core of its character, allowing the driver to morph it from a composed cruiser to a surprisingly aggressive machine in Corsa mode. While the 4,844 lbs weight is impossible to disguise in tight, technical corners, the adaptive chassis and torque vectoring work wonders to mask its bulk. It is undeniably fast, offering a unique sensation of speed that feels entirely at home in the Lamborghini family of vehicles.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Audi RS e-tron GT takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 78 against 78. Characteristic of the Audi RS e-tron GT: Immense, silent electric acceleration with quattro-assured composure. For the Lamborghini Urus: Startlingly quick and composed for a large luxury SUV. In outright terms it is 637 hp against 641 — a 4 hp gap — and the Audi RS e-tron GT reaches 60 mph 0.5s sooner.
Interior & Cabin: Audi RS e-tron GT vs Lamborghini Urus
The interior is a high-tech sanctuary, dominated by a driver-focused dashboard and the crisp Audi Virtual Cockpit. Sustainable materials are used throughout, reflecting a modern approach to luxury without compromising on build quality or feel. The digital interfaces are intuitive, though the reliance on touch-sensitive controls for certain functions can be less tactile than physical buttons while on the move. Space is ample for four adults, and the dual-screen setup creates a sophisticated, connected environment that feels perfectly suited for a high-performance electric tourer. It is a cabin that successfully blends traditional Audi craftsmanship with progressive, forward-thinking technology.
The cabin of the Lamborghini Urus successfully blends SUV practicality with the theatricality of a supercar. Five occupants can fit comfortably, and the design cues—like the fighter-jet style starter button and angular vents—leave no doubt about its heritage. While the platform shares components with other high-end VW Group SUVs, Lamborghini has done enough to differentiate the experience with high-quality stitching, carbon inserts, and a dramatic digital display layout. It is a genuinely functional space, featuring a large panoramic roof that keeps the interior feeling airy and modern despite the aggressive, cocooning architecture.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Audi RS e-tron GT takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 86 against 85. Characteristic of the Audi RS e-tron GT: Premium, minimalist cabin with excellent tech integration. For the Lamborghini Urus: Dramatic, driver-focused cabin unlike most luxury SUV rivals.
Daily Usability: Audi RS e-tron GT vs Lamborghini Urus
Practicality is a strong suit for the RS e-tron GT, offering a 405L boot plus additional storage in the front trunk, making it an excellent daily prospect. The ride is firm in Dynamic mode but remains composed enough for long-distance cruising, absorbing motorway imperfections with ease. Charging is a simple affair, with fast-charging capabilities allowing for 80% replenishment in just over twenty minutes, significantly increasing the vehicle's real-world usability. It is a highly capable machine for routine errands and long-distance touring, provided the driver is aware of the low stance and the necessity of managing battery capacity on longer jaunts.
Practicality is where the Lamborghini Urus truly shines, offering a 616L boot and genuine rear-seat legroom that makes it the most usable model in the brand’s history. For urban errands, the air suspension provides the ability to clear obstacles easily, and the elevated driving position offers excellent visibility that the mid-engined cars lack. It is a vehicle that handles the school run and high-speed motorway travel with equal ease. Despite its SUV badge, the running costs are undeniably steep, particularly fuel and tyre consumption, but the trade-off is a vehicle that requires no compromise on utility.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Lamborghini Urus takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 80 against 82. Characteristic of the Audi RS e-tron GT: Comfortable, quiet, effortless daily EV with real usability. For the Lamborghini Urus: Genuinely practical family SUV with supercar-embarrassing pace. that means 405 litres of boot space against 616, plus a usable front boot in the Audi RS e-tron GT, and everyday running costs that favour the Audi RS e-tron GT at the pumps.
Ownership: Audi RS e-tron GT vs Lamborghini Urus
Ownership of this EV is relatively straightforward, as the simplicity of the electric drivetrain results in lower annual maintenance costs than its internal combustion rivals. The four-year, 50k mile warranty provides a solid foundation for peace of mind, though long-term battery health remains a key consideration for high-mileage users. The RS e-tron GT benefits from the extensive Audi dealer and charging network, making it one of the most accessible high-performance EVs on the market. While residual values for luxury EVs remain volatile, the model’s performance and build quality help maintain a solid market position among modern, tech-focused buyers.
The ownership proposition of the Lamborghini Urus is bolstered by a vastly expanded dealer network and a steady supply of high-end service support. Running costs are significant, with high tyre consumption being a primary concern for owners who utilise the V8’s full performance regularly. However, the Urus has proven to be a robust performer with strong residual values that make it popular on the lease market. It offers a level of brand participation that is accessible yet exclusive, providing a gateway into Lamborghini ownership that is fundamentally grounded in everyday usability and reliability.
Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Audi RS e-tron GT takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 82 against 65. Characteristic of the Audi RS e-tron GT: Low running costs typical of an EV, strong warranty coverage. For the Lamborghini Urus: Strong demand keeps residuals healthy for Lamborghini's best-selling model. On the wallet the two diverge at £125,000 versus £185,000 — a £60,000 difference, with annual maintenance of £1,000 against £2,500, and warranty cover of 4yr / 50k mi versus 3yr / unlimited mi.