Aston Martin Vantage vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

Compare the Aston Martin Vantage vs Ferrari F8 Tributo. The Aston Martin Vantage is £104,100 cheaper. The Ferrari F8 Tributo is 0.6s quicker to 60mph. The Aston Martin Vantage is more fuel efficient. Full performance, cost & ownership breakdown.

The Aston Martin Vantage is priced from £120,900, powered by a 4.0L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 503 hp, with 685 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 3.5s, a top speed of 195 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive. The Ferrari F8 Tributo is priced from £268,000, powered by a 3.9L Twin-Turbo V8, producing 710 hp, with 770 Nm of torque, reaching 0-60 mph in 2.9s, a top speed of 211 mph, sent to the road via rear-wheel drive.

The Aston Martin Vantage offers a 350-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 25mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty. The Ferrari F8 Tributo offers a 200-litre boot, runs on petrol, returns around 21 mpg, is covered by a 3yr / unlimited mi warranty.

On cost of ownership, the Aston Martin Vantage is £104,100 cheaper than its rival, both require around £900 per year in maintenance, the Aston Martin Vantage is the more fuel-efficient choice, a full tank costs around £110 for the Aston Martin Vantage and £85 for the Ferrari F8 Tributo.

Driving Character: Aston Martin Vantage vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

The Vantage utilizes a 4.0L twin-turbo V8 to deliver a punchy 503 hp that defines its boisterous character. Its short wheelbase and wide track create a nimble, almost twitchy handling profile that demands constant input from the driver. The steering is direct, and the rear-wheel-drive architecture allows for significant adjustability through corners, though the traction control often intervenes aggressively in wet conditions to manage the 685 Nm of torque. It is a sports car that rewards experienced hands, trading absolute refinement for an engaging, visceral experience that feels decidedly more muscular than many of its rivals.

The Ferrari F8 Tributo represents the zenith of the mid-engine V8 lineage, balancing 710hp with a chassis that feels telepathic. It offers immense, exploitable grip, though the sheer power delivery requires a disciplined hand. The steering is light but incredibly communicative, allowing the driver to place the nose with pinpoint precision through mid-corner transitions. Ride quality remains surprisingly compliant for such a potent platform, yet it never masks the mechanical intensity of the engine. It is a car that thrives on commitment, demanding full focus to extract the absolute limit, ultimately rewarding the driver with an experience that feels remarkably connected and raw.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari F8 Tributo takes our 0-100 driving character grading, 84 against 92. Characteristic of the Aston Martin Vantage: Sharp, engaging chassis with a thunderous AMG-sourced V8. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Sharp, communicative handling with blistering turbocharged V8 pace. In outright terms it is 503 hp against 710 — a 207 hp gap — and the Ferrari F8 Tributo reaches 60 mph 0.6s sooner.

Interior & Cabin: Aston Martin Vantage vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

The interior is a focused, driver-centric environment, though the reliance on older-generation Mercedes-Benz switchgear is increasingly apparent against modern standards. The cabin is trimmed in high-quality Alcantara and leather, conveying a sense of purpose rather than pure opulence. The rotary infotainment controller is functional but lacks the slickness of current touchscreen interfaces. While the driving position is low and perfectly suited for spirited work, some materials in the lower dashboard areas lack the premium feel one might expect given the brand’s positioning. Practicality is limited, yet the space feels appropriate for a focused sports machine.

Inside, the F8 Tributo strips away unnecessary clutter in favour of a driver-centric environment. It embraces a clean, functional aesthetic where materials are high-grade and tactile. The integration of modern tech, including standard Apple CarPlay, represents a significant leap forward compared to its predecessors. While the cabin is intimate, the ergonomics are spot-on, putting every vital control within easy reach of the steering wheel. It is not designed for grand touring, however, and the limited luggage space highlights its primary focus on short, sharp bursts of driving pleasure rather than extended road trips.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Aston Martin Vantage takes our 0-100 interior & cabin grading, 80 against 78. Characteristic of the Aston Martin Vantage: Significantly improved cabin quality and tech over the outgoing car. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Driver-focused cabin with strong build quality.

Daily Usability: Aston Martin Vantage vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

Daily usability is a mixed bag, with the Vantage excelling on open roads while requiring caution in urban settings. The front trunk provides a modest 325L of storage, which is surprisingly practical for short trips, provided one watches the low front splitter on kerbs and speed bumps. The ride is notably firm, especially in Sport mode, which can be fatiguing over longer distances on poor road surfaces. However, for a high-performance sports car, its compact dimensions make it relatively easy to place in traffic, provided the driver is mindful of the wide bodywork during parking.

For such an aggressive machine, the Ferrari F8 Tributo displays unexpected manners during low-speed transit. Magnetorheological dampers effectively smooth out broken asphalt, making it perfectly usable for occasional town work if one exercises caution with the width. Parking is a manageable task, though the rearward visibility reminds the owner of its mid-engine configuration. It is relatively compact by modern supercar standards, which aids in navigating tighter roads, yet the modest storage capacity effectively limits its utility to the basics. It functions as a versatile toy, rather than a multipurpose tool, for those who value performance above practical cargo requirements.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Aston Martin Vantage takes our 0-100 daily usability grading, 62 against 60. Characteristic of the Aston Martin Vantage: More usable day-to-day than previous Vantage generations. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Usable as an occasional daily supercar. that means 350 litres of boot space against 200, and everyday running costs that favour the Aston Martin Vantage at the pumps.

Ownership: Aston Martin Vantage vs Ferrari F8 Tributo

The ownership proposition of the Vantage has improved significantly, with an expanding dealer network that makes servicing more accessible than in previous years. Maintenance costs are relatively modest at £900 annually, though turbo-related upkeep can add up as the car ages. The Vantage badge retains considerable brand cachet, which keeps residual values strong in the competitive sports car market. It remains a popular choice for those who want a blend of heritage, performance, and day-to-day usability without the extreme costs associated with the ultra-luxury, low-volume models in the Aston Martin stable.

As the final pure, non-hybrid V8, the Ferrari F8 Tributo occupies a unique space in the marque’s history. Values are currently climbing, cementing its status as an essential collector’s item for enthusiasts of internal combustion. While it offers a three-year unlimited mileage warranty, prospective owners should be mindful that official servicing options at authorised dealers are becoming more constrained as production models phase out. Insurance premiums are significant, reflecting the car's extreme performance profile and the rarity of its components, making it a purchase that requires careful financial planning to maintain properly over the long term.

Head-to-head, the division is clear: the Ferrari F8 Tributo takes our 0-100 ownership grading, 58 against 76. Characteristic of the Aston Martin Vantage: Entry-level Aston with a strong enthusiast following. For the Ferrari F8 Tributo: Strong reliability reputation among modern Ferraris. On the wallet the two diverge at £120,900 versus £268,000 — a £147,100 difference, with annual maintenance of £900 against £0.

More comparisons to explore